TY - JOUR
T1 - Does inflammation contribute to the eradication of basal cell carcinoma following curettage and electrodesiccation?
AU - Spencer, James M.
AU - Tannenbaum, Alan
AU - Sloan, Luke
AU - Amonette, Rex A.
PY - 1997/8
Y1 - 1997/8
N2 - BACKGROUND. Curettage and electrodesiccation (C and D) is probably the technique most frequently utilized by dermatologists to treat basal cell carcinomas (BCC). From histologic studies, it appears C and D does not completely mechanically remove all nests of BCC in a substantial number of cases. Nevertheless, the reported 5-year reoccurrence rate following C and D is significantly less than this histologically observed residual tumor frequency immediately following C and D. Among the multiple possibilities that exist to explain why these residual nests do not appear as recurrent tumor more frequently is the theory that inflammation developing after C and D clears residual tumor. OBJECTIVE. To test the hypothesis that inflammation developing after C and D clears residual tumor not mechanically removed by the procedure. METHODS. The frequency of residual BCC detected histologically immediately following C and D was compared with the frequency 1 month after the C and D, an amount of time in which an effect (if any) of inflammation could occur. RESULTS. Twenty-two of 29 primary BCC <1 cm treated by C and D were tumor free immediately following the procedure (clearance rate, 75.9%). Eleven of 14 primary BCC <1 cm treated by C and D then allowed to granulate 1 month before excision and histologic analysis were tumor free, for a clearance rate of 78.6%. Examination of larger tumors immediately following C and D revealed size is a significant variable for clearance rates. Eleven primary BCC >1 cm but <2 cm were examined histologically immediately following C and D; only three were tumor free for a clearance rate of 27.3%. Only one of five tumors >2 cm thus treated was tumor free, for a clearance rate of 20%. Nine recurrent BCC of various sizes were treated by C and D and immediately examined histologically. Two were tumor free for a clearance rate of 22.2%. Two recurrent BCC were allowed to heal 1 month following C and D; one of these was tumor free when excised. CONCLUSION. For primary BCC <1 cm, no evidence was found that inflammation occurring over 1 month following C and D clears residual tumor. It was also noted that C and D fails to completely remove tumor in a large majority of primary BCC >1 cm, and in recurrent BCC.
AB - BACKGROUND. Curettage and electrodesiccation (C and D) is probably the technique most frequently utilized by dermatologists to treat basal cell carcinomas (BCC). From histologic studies, it appears C and D does not completely mechanically remove all nests of BCC in a substantial number of cases. Nevertheless, the reported 5-year reoccurrence rate following C and D is significantly less than this histologically observed residual tumor frequency immediately following C and D. Among the multiple possibilities that exist to explain why these residual nests do not appear as recurrent tumor more frequently is the theory that inflammation developing after C and D clears residual tumor. OBJECTIVE. To test the hypothesis that inflammation developing after C and D clears residual tumor not mechanically removed by the procedure. METHODS. The frequency of residual BCC detected histologically immediately following C and D was compared with the frequency 1 month after the C and D, an amount of time in which an effect (if any) of inflammation could occur. RESULTS. Twenty-two of 29 primary BCC <1 cm treated by C and D were tumor free immediately following the procedure (clearance rate, 75.9%). Eleven of 14 primary BCC <1 cm treated by C and D then allowed to granulate 1 month before excision and histologic analysis were tumor free, for a clearance rate of 78.6%. Examination of larger tumors immediately following C and D revealed size is a significant variable for clearance rates. Eleven primary BCC >1 cm but <2 cm were examined histologically immediately following C and D; only three were tumor free for a clearance rate of 27.3%. Only one of five tumors >2 cm thus treated was tumor free, for a clearance rate of 20%. Nine recurrent BCC of various sizes were treated by C and D and immediately examined histologically. Two were tumor free for a clearance rate of 22.2%. Two recurrent BCC were allowed to heal 1 month following C and D; one of these was tumor free when excised. CONCLUSION. For primary BCC <1 cm, no evidence was found that inflammation occurring over 1 month following C and D clears residual tumor. It was also noted that C and D fails to completely remove tumor in a large majority of primary BCC >1 cm, and in recurrent BCC.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030824919&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1524-4725.1997.tb00379.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1524-4725.1997.tb00379.x
M3 - Article
C2 - 9256908
AN - SCOPUS:0030824919
SN - 1076-0512
VL - 23
SP - 625
EP - 630
JO - Dermatologic Surgery
JF - Dermatologic Surgery
IS - 8
ER -