TY - JOUR
T1 - Distal Embolic Protection for Infrainguinal Interventions
T2 - How to and When?
AU - Lookstein, Robert A.
AU - Lewis, Sara
PY - 2010/3
Y1 - 2010/3
N2 - Distal embolization is a well-recognized complication during lower extremity revascularization procedures. Preliminary work has shown safety and feasibility of the use of embolic protection devices in this vascular territory. While many interventionalists believe that this technology offers a clear benefit for infrainguinal use based on the clinical safety data seen in other vascular beds, others believe that the exact role is poorly defined. All clinical experience to date has been with devices designed for other vascular territories and this has created a unique set of technical obstacles and potential risks. At present, clinical use is increasing despite a lack of data regarding which patients are at greatest risk for distal embolization, which anatomy is appropriate for the use of this technology, and which device, if any, is ideally suited for the infrainguinal arterial circulation. In addition, the clinical relevance and effect of distal embolization in the lower extremity remains poorly understood. Ultimately, more trial data may be necessary to substantiate the increased use of distal protection devices in infrainguinal interventions to justify the increase in cost, complexity, and potential risks associated with the use of this technology.
AB - Distal embolization is a well-recognized complication during lower extremity revascularization procedures. Preliminary work has shown safety and feasibility of the use of embolic protection devices in this vascular territory. While many interventionalists believe that this technology offers a clear benefit for infrainguinal use based on the clinical safety data seen in other vascular beds, others believe that the exact role is poorly defined. All clinical experience to date has been with devices designed for other vascular territories and this has created a unique set of technical obstacles and potential risks. At present, clinical use is increasing despite a lack of data regarding which patients are at greatest risk for distal embolization, which anatomy is appropriate for the use of this technology, and which device, if any, is ideally suited for the infrainguinal arterial circulation. In addition, the clinical relevance and effect of distal embolization in the lower extremity remains poorly understood. Ultimately, more trial data may be necessary to substantiate the increased use of distal protection devices in infrainguinal interventions to justify the increase in cost, complexity, and potential risks associated with the use of this technology.
KW - embolic protection device
KW - peripheral arterial disease
KW - revascularization
KW - thromboembolism
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=72149117107&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1053/j.tvir.2009.10.007
DO - 10.1053/j.tvir.2009.10.007
M3 - Review article
C2 - 20123433
AN - SCOPUS:72149117107
SN - 1089-2516
VL - 13
SP - 54
EP - 58
JO - Techniques in Vascular and Interventional Radiology
JF - Techniques in Vascular and Interventional Radiology
IS - 1
ER -