TY - JOUR
T1 - Disparities in neoadjuvant radiation dosing for treatment of rectal cancer
AU - Ofshteyn, Asya
AU - Bingmer, Katherine
AU - Dorth, Jennifer
AU - Dietz, David
AU - Steinhagen, Emily
AU - Stein, Sharon L.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2020/10
Y1 - 2020/10
N2 - Background: Certain patients are less likely to undergo appropriate cancer treatment, worsening their overall cancer survival. The purpose of this investigation was to identify factors associated with inadequate neoadjuvant radiation for rectal cancer. Methods: The National Cancer Database was queried for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who received neoadjuvant radiation 2006–2014. Adequate radiation was considered to be 4,500-5,040 cGy. Demographic, hospital and clinical variables were analyzed for association with inadequate radiation. Results: The study cohort was 34,391 patients; 1,842(5.4%) received inadequate radiation. On multivariate analysis, female gender, older age, other race, government-provided insurance, lower clinical stage and rural location correlated with inadequate radiation. Conclusions: Women were 50% less likely than men to receive correct neoadjuvant radiation dosing. Other factors including age, race, insurance, clinical stage, geographic location and neoadjuvant chemotherapy were significantly associated with radiation dosing. These factors should be evaluated to determine if they can be modified to improve outcomes.
AB - Background: Certain patients are less likely to undergo appropriate cancer treatment, worsening their overall cancer survival. The purpose of this investigation was to identify factors associated with inadequate neoadjuvant radiation for rectal cancer. Methods: The National Cancer Database was queried for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who received neoadjuvant radiation 2006–2014. Adequate radiation was considered to be 4,500-5,040 cGy. Demographic, hospital and clinical variables were analyzed for association with inadequate radiation. Results: The study cohort was 34,391 patients; 1,842(5.4%) received inadequate radiation. On multivariate analysis, female gender, older age, other race, government-provided insurance, lower clinical stage and rural location correlated with inadequate radiation. Conclusions: Women were 50% less likely than men to receive correct neoadjuvant radiation dosing. Other factors including age, race, insurance, clinical stage, geographic location and neoadjuvant chemotherapy were significantly associated with radiation dosing. These factors should be evaluated to determine if they can be modified to improve outcomes.
KW - Gender disparity
KW - Healthcare disparities
KW - Neoadjuvant radiation
KW - Radiation dosing
KW - Rectal cancer
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85078047527&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.01.016
DO - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.01.016
M3 - Article
C2 - 31959352
AN - SCOPUS:85078047527
SN - 0002-9610
VL - 220
SP - 987
EP - 992
JO - American Journal of Surgery
JF - American Journal of Surgery
IS - 4
ER -