TY - JOUR
T1 - Direct-Acting Antiviral Therapy for Hepatitis C Virus Infection Is Associated With Increased Survival in Patients With a History of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
AU - Singal, Amit G.
AU - Rich, Nicole E.
AU - Mehta, Neil
AU - Branch, Andrea D.
AU - Pillai, Anjana
AU - Hoteit, Maarouf
AU - Volk, Michael
AU - Odewole, Mobolaji
AU - Scaglione, Steven
AU - Guy, Jennifer
AU - Said, Adnan
AU - Feld, Jordan J.
AU - John, Binu V.
AU - Frenette, Catherine
AU - Mantry, Parvez
AU - Rangnekar, Amol S.
AU - Oloruntoba, Omobonike
AU - Leise, Michael
AU - Jou, Janice H.
AU - Bhamidimarri, Kalyan Ram
AU - Kulik, Laura
AU - Ioannou, George N.
AU - Huang, Annsa
AU - Tran, Tram
AU - Samant, Hrishikesh
AU - Dhanasekaran, Renumathy
AU - Duarte-Rojo, Andres
AU - Salgia, Reena
AU - Eswaran, Sheila
AU - Jalal, Prasun
AU - Flores, Avegail
AU - Satapathy, Sanjaya K.
AU - Kagan, Sofia
AU - Gopal, Purva
AU - Wong, Robert
AU - Parikh, Neehar D.
AU - Murphy, Caitlin C.
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding This study was conducted with support National Cancer Institute R01 CA222900 and grant support from AbbVie. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health or AbbVie. The funding agencies had no role in design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; or preparation of the manuscript.
Funding Information:
Conflicts of interest These authors disclose the following: Amit Singal was on speakers bureau for Gilead, Bayer, and Bristol Meyers Squibb. He has served on advisory boards for Gilead, AbbVie, Bayer, Eisai, Bristol Meyers Squibb, Wako Diagnostics, and Exact Sciences. He serves as a consultant to Bayer, Eisai, Exelixis, Roche, Exact Sciences, and Glycotest. He has received research funding from Gilead and AbbVie. Neil Mehta has received research funding from Wako Diagnostics. Anjana Pillai serves as a consultant and is on speakers bureau for Eisai and BTG. Jordan Feld has received research support from Gilead, AbbVie, Merck, and Janssen. Binu John has served on advisory boards for Eisai. Catherine Frenette is on speakers bureaus for Bayer, Bristol Meyers Squibb, Gilead, Merck, AbbVie, and Eisai. She served on advisory boards for Gilead, Eisai, and Wako. She served as a consultant for Bayer and Gilead. She received research funding from Bayer. Parvez Mantry is on speakers bureaus and served on advisory boards for Gilead, AbbVie, Bayer, BMS, Eisai, Merck, and BTG. He has received research funding from Gilead and Sirtex. Michael Leise has received research funding from AbbVie. Kalyan Ram Bhamidimarri serves as scientific advisory board member for Gilead, Merck, and AbbVie. He has received research funding from Gilead. Laura Kulik is on speakers bureau for Eisai, Gilead, and Dova. She serves as an advisory board member for BMS, Eisai, Bayer, and Exelixis. Reena Salgia is on speakers bureau for Bayer. She has served on advisory boards for Bayer, Eisai, and Exelixis. Sanjaya Satapathy has received grant/research support from Biotest, Conatus, Genfit, Gilead Sciences, Intercept, Dova, Bayer, Exact Sciences, and Shire; served on the advisory board or as consultant for AbbVie, Gilead Sciences, and Intercept; and on the speakers bureau for Intercept, Dova, and Alexion. Robert Wong is on the speakers bureau, served as consultant and on advisory boards, and has received research funding from Gilead. He has also received research funding from AbbVie. He was on the speakers bureau for Bayer. Neehar Parikh serves as a consultant to Exelexis and Bristol-Myers Squibb. He has served on advisory boards for Eisai and Bayer. Andrea Branch served as a consultant to Boehringer Ingelheim and has received research support from Gilead. The remaining authors disclose no conflicts.Funding This study was conducted with support National Cancer Institute R01 CA222900 and grant support from AbbVie. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health or AbbVie. The funding agencies had no role in design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; or preparation of the manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 AGA Institute
PY - 2019/11
Y1 - 2019/11
N2 - Background & Aims: There is controversy regarding the benefits of direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection for patients with a history of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We performed a multicenter cohort study to compare overall survival between patients with HCV infection treated with DAAs and patients who did not receive DAA treatment for their HCV infection after complete response to prior HCC therapy. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with HCV-related HCC who achieved a complete response to resection, local ablation, transarterial chemo- or radioembolization, or radiation therapy, from January 2013 through December 2017 at 31 health care systems throughout the United States and Canada. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to determine the association between receipt of DAA therapy, modeled as a time-varying covariate, and all-cause mortality, accounting for informative censoring and confounding using inverse probability weighting. Results: Of 797 patients with HCV-related HCC, 383 (48.1%) received DAA therapy and 414 (51.9%) did not receive treatment for their HCV infection after complete response to prior HCC therapy. Among DAA-treated patients, 43 deaths occurred during 941 person-years of follow-up, compared with 103 deaths during 526.6 person-years of follow-up among patients who did not receive DAA therapy (crude rate ratio, 0.23; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.16–0.33). In inverse probability-weighted analyses, DAA therapy was associated with a significant reduction in risk of death (hazard ratio, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.33–0.90). This association differed by sustained virologic response to DAA therapy; risk of death was reduced in patients with sustained virologic response to DAA therapy (hazard ratio, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.18–0.47), but not in patients without a sustained virologic response (hazard ratio, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.55–2.33). Conclusions: In an analysis of nearly 800 patients with complete response to HCC treatment, DAA therapy was associated with a significant reduction in risk of death.
AB - Background & Aims: There is controversy regarding the benefits of direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection for patients with a history of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We performed a multicenter cohort study to compare overall survival between patients with HCV infection treated with DAAs and patients who did not receive DAA treatment for their HCV infection after complete response to prior HCC therapy. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with HCV-related HCC who achieved a complete response to resection, local ablation, transarterial chemo- or radioembolization, or radiation therapy, from January 2013 through December 2017 at 31 health care systems throughout the United States and Canada. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to determine the association between receipt of DAA therapy, modeled as a time-varying covariate, and all-cause mortality, accounting for informative censoring and confounding using inverse probability weighting. Results: Of 797 patients with HCV-related HCC, 383 (48.1%) received DAA therapy and 414 (51.9%) did not receive treatment for their HCV infection after complete response to prior HCC therapy. Among DAA-treated patients, 43 deaths occurred during 941 person-years of follow-up, compared with 103 deaths during 526.6 person-years of follow-up among patients who did not receive DAA therapy (crude rate ratio, 0.23; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.16–0.33). In inverse probability-weighted analyses, DAA therapy was associated with a significant reduction in risk of death (hazard ratio, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.33–0.90). This association differed by sustained virologic response to DAA therapy; risk of death was reduced in patients with sustained virologic response to DAA therapy (hazard ratio, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.18–0.47), but not in patients without a sustained virologic response (hazard ratio, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.55–2.33). Conclusions: In an analysis of nearly 800 patients with complete response to HCC treatment, DAA therapy was associated with a significant reduction in risk of death.
KW - HCC
KW - Hepatitis C
KW - Liver Cancer
KW - Survival
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070813996&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.07.040
DO - 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.07.040
M3 - Article
C2 - 31374215
AN - SCOPUS:85070813996
SN - 0016-5085
VL - 157
SP - 1253-1263.e2
JO - Gastroenterology
JF - Gastroenterology
IS - 5
ER -