TY - JOUR
T1 - Differentiation of Malignant Omental Caking from Benign Omental Thickening using MRI
AU - Doshi, Ankur M.
AU - Campbell, Naomi
AU - Hajdu, Cristina H.
AU - Rosenkrantz, Andrew B.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014, Springer Science+Business Media New York.
PY - 2015/6/1
Y1 - 2015/6/1
N2 - Purpose: To determine multi-parametric MRI features that can help differentiate malignant omental caking from benign omental thickening in the setting of portal hypertension. Methods: We identified 19 patients with an abnormal omentum on MRI and an available reference standard: 11 patients with portal hypertension and benign omental thickening (9 male, 2 female, mean age 58 ± 6 years) and 8 patients with metastatic omental caking (4 male, 4 female, mean age 61 ± 13 years). Criteria for benign omental thickening were no evidence of malignancy for at least 24 months of follow-up (n = 7), negative ascites cytology (n = 2), or absence of malignancy on pathologic analysis of liver explant (n = 2). Criteria for omental malignancy were positive omental biopsy (n = 6) or ascites cytology (n = 2). Two radiologists (R1 and R2) evaluated characteristics of the thickened omentum on MRI. Results: Findings occurring with significantly higher frequency in malignant omental caking were hyperintensity on high b-value diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) (R1 88% vs. 0%, R2 88% vs. 0%), hyperenhancement (R1 75% vs. 0%, R2 75% vs. 0%), and convex outer omental contour (R1 88% vs. 0%, R2 75% vs. 9%) (all p ≤ 0.001); discrete omental nodules were significantly more frequent in malignant omental thickening for R1 (63% vs. 0%, p = 0.005). Features not significantly different between groups included decreased ADC, T2 hyperintensity, vessels coursing through the omentum, moderate/large volume ascites, splenomegaly, and mesenteric edema (all p ≥ 0.058). Conclusion: Abnormal signal on DWI, hyperenhancement, and convex outer contour are helpful MRI features to differentiate malignant from benign omental thickening.
AB - Purpose: To determine multi-parametric MRI features that can help differentiate malignant omental caking from benign omental thickening in the setting of portal hypertension. Methods: We identified 19 patients with an abnormal omentum on MRI and an available reference standard: 11 patients with portal hypertension and benign omental thickening (9 male, 2 female, mean age 58 ± 6 years) and 8 patients with metastatic omental caking (4 male, 4 female, mean age 61 ± 13 years). Criteria for benign omental thickening were no evidence of malignancy for at least 24 months of follow-up (n = 7), negative ascites cytology (n = 2), or absence of malignancy on pathologic analysis of liver explant (n = 2). Criteria for omental malignancy were positive omental biopsy (n = 6) or ascites cytology (n = 2). Two radiologists (R1 and R2) evaluated characteristics of the thickened omentum on MRI. Results: Findings occurring with significantly higher frequency in malignant omental caking were hyperintensity on high b-value diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) (R1 88% vs. 0%, R2 88% vs. 0%), hyperenhancement (R1 75% vs. 0%, R2 75% vs. 0%), and convex outer omental contour (R1 88% vs. 0%, R2 75% vs. 9%) (all p ≤ 0.001); discrete omental nodules were significantly more frequent in malignant omental thickening for R1 (63% vs. 0%, p = 0.005). Features not significantly different between groups included decreased ADC, T2 hyperintensity, vessels coursing through the omentum, moderate/large volume ascites, splenomegaly, and mesenteric edema (all p ≥ 0.058). Conclusion: Abnormal signal on DWI, hyperenhancement, and convex outer contour are helpful MRI features to differentiate malignant from benign omental thickening.
KW - Cirrhosis
KW - Omental caking
KW - Peritoneal carcinomatosis
KW - Portal hypertension
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930179569&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00261-014-0259-x
DO - 10.1007/s00261-014-0259-x
M3 - Article
C2 - 25311992
AN - SCOPUS:84930179569
SN - 0942-8925
VL - 40
SP - 1157
EP - 1163
JO - Abdominal Imaging
JF - Abdominal Imaging
IS - 5
ER -