TY - JOUR
T1 - Difference between antegrade and retrograde orbital atherectomy system debulking using an artificial pulsatile heart model
AU - Kawamura, Akito
AU - Egami, Yasuyuki
AU - Okamoto, Naotaka
AU - Kawanami, Shodai
AU - Yasumoto, Koji
AU - Tsuda, Masaki
AU - Matsunaga-Lee, Yasuharu
AU - Yano, Masamichi
AU - Nishino, Masami
AU - Okayama, Keita
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
PY - 2024/1/1
Y1 - 2024/1/1
N2 - Background: Debulking devices are necessary to treat severe calcified lesions. OAS has a unique characteristic that the burr moves forward and backward. There are few studies reporting the differences of ablation style between only-antegrade and only-retrograde OAS. Aims: The aim of this study was to evaluate the difference of ablation style between only-antegrade and only-retrograde orbital atherectomy system (OAS) using an artificial pulsatile heart model (HEARTROID system®) and optical coherence tomography (OCT). Methods: The calcified lesion model was inserted into the mid of left anterior descending in the HEARTROID®. Only-antegrade and only-retrograde ablation of OAS were conducted for each five lesions. Pre-OCT, OCT after low speed debulking and OCT after high speed debulking were conducted. The width and the depth of debulked area, the debulked area and the direction of debulked area were investigated. Results: In all of 210 cross-sections, 91 debulked cross sections were chosen for analysis. Only-antegrade group had 47 debulked cross-sections, and only-retrograde group 44 cross-sections. In the evaluation of OCT after high speed debulking, the debulked area (0.76 mm2 [0.58−0.91] vs. 0.53 mm2 [0.36−0.68], p < 0.001) and the depth of debulked area (0.76 mm [0.58−0.91] vs. 0.53 mm [0.36−0.68], p < 0.001) were significantly higher in only-antegrade group compared to only-retrograde group. The debulked bias and the width of debulked area are not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusions: Compared to only-retrograde debulking, only-antegrade debulking acquired larger debulked area because of larger cutting depth, although the debulked bias and the width of debulked area were comparable between the two groups.
AB - Background: Debulking devices are necessary to treat severe calcified lesions. OAS has a unique characteristic that the burr moves forward and backward. There are few studies reporting the differences of ablation style between only-antegrade and only-retrograde OAS. Aims: The aim of this study was to evaluate the difference of ablation style between only-antegrade and only-retrograde orbital atherectomy system (OAS) using an artificial pulsatile heart model (HEARTROID system®) and optical coherence tomography (OCT). Methods: The calcified lesion model was inserted into the mid of left anterior descending in the HEARTROID®. Only-antegrade and only-retrograde ablation of OAS were conducted for each five lesions. Pre-OCT, OCT after low speed debulking and OCT after high speed debulking were conducted. The width and the depth of debulked area, the debulked area and the direction of debulked area were investigated. Results: In all of 210 cross-sections, 91 debulked cross sections were chosen for analysis. Only-antegrade group had 47 debulked cross-sections, and only-retrograde group 44 cross-sections. In the evaluation of OCT after high speed debulking, the debulked area (0.76 mm2 [0.58−0.91] vs. 0.53 mm2 [0.36−0.68], p < 0.001) and the depth of debulked area (0.76 mm [0.58−0.91] vs. 0.53 mm [0.36−0.68], p < 0.001) were significantly higher in only-antegrade group compared to only-retrograde group. The debulked bias and the width of debulked area are not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusions: Compared to only-retrograde debulking, only-antegrade debulking acquired larger debulked area because of larger cutting depth, although the debulked bias and the width of debulked area were comparable between the two groups.
KW - in vivo experimental study
KW - optical coherence tomography
KW - orbital atherectomy system
KW - severe calcified lesion
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85179369674
U2 - 10.1002/ccd.30925
DO - 10.1002/ccd.30925
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85179369674
SN - 1522-1946
VL - 103
SP - 42
EP - 50
JO - Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
JF - Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
IS - 1
ER -