TY - JOUR
T1 - Diet and survival after a diagnosis of ovarian cancer
T2 - a pooled analysis from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium
AU - for the Multidisciplinary Ovarian Cancer Outcomes Group and Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium
AU - Nagle, Christina M.
AU - Ibiebele, Torukiri I.
AU - Na, Renhua
AU - Bandera, Elisa V.
AU - Cramer, Daniel
AU - Doherty, Jennifer A.
AU - Giles, Graham G.
AU - Goodman, Marc T.
AU - Hanley, Gillian E.
AU - Harris, Holly R.
AU - Jensen, Allan
AU - Kjaer, Susanne K.
AU - Lee, Alice
AU - McGuire, Valerie
AU - Milne, Roger L.
AU - Qin, Bo
AU - Richardson, Jean
AU - Sasamoto, Naoko
AU - Schildkraut, Joellen M.
AU - Sieh, Weiva
AU - Terry, Kathryn L.
AU - Titus, Linda
AU - Trabert, Britton
AU - Wentzensen, Nicolas
AU - Wu, Anna H.
AU - Berchuck, Andrew
AU - Pike, Malcolm C.
AU - Pearce, Celeste Leigh
AU - Webb, Penelope M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Authors
PY - 2025/4
Y1 - 2025/4
N2 - Background: Prognosis after a diagnosis of invasive epithelial ovarian cancer is poor. Some studies have suggested modifiable behaviors, like diet, are associated with survival but the evidence is inconsistent. Objectives: This study aims to pool data from studies conducted around the world to evaluate the relationships among dietary indices, foods, and nutrients from food sources and survival after a diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Methods: This analysis from the Multidisciplinary Ovarian Cancer Outcomes Group within the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium included 13 studies with 7700 individuals with ovarian cancer, who completed food-frequency questionnaires regarding their prediagnosis diet. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for associations with overall survival were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models. Results: Overall, there was no association between any of the 7 dietary indices (representing prediagnosis diet) evaluated and survival; however, associations differed by tumor stage. Although there were no consistent associations among those with advanced disease, among those with earlier stage (local/regional) disease, higher scores on the alternate Healthy Eating Index (aHR quartile 4 compared with 1 = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.50, 0.87), Healthy Eating Index-2015 (aHR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.59, 0.97), and alternate Mediterranean diet (aHR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.60, 0.98) were associated with better survival. Better survival was also observed for individuals with early-stage disease who reported higher intakes of dietary components that contribute to the healthy diet indices (aHR for Q4 compared with Q1: vegetables 0.71; 95% CI: 0.56, 0.91), tomatoes (aHR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.57, 0.91) and nuts and seeds (aHR 0.71; 95% CI: 0.55, 0.92). In contrast, there were suggestions of worse survival with higher scores on 2 of the 3 inflammatory indices and higher intake of trans-fatty acids. Conclusions: Adherence to a more healthy, less-inflammatory diet may confer a survival benefit for individuals with early-stage ovarian cancer.
AB - Background: Prognosis after a diagnosis of invasive epithelial ovarian cancer is poor. Some studies have suggested modifiable behaviors, like diet, are associated with survival but the evidence is inconsistent. Objectives: This study aims to pool data from studies conducted around the world to evaluate the relationships among dietary indices, foods, and nutrients from food sources and survival after a diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Methods: This analysis from the Multidisciplinary Ovarian Cancer Outcomes Group within the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium included 13 studies with 7700 individuals with ovarian cancer, who completed food-frequency questionnaires regarding their prediagnosis diet. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for associations with overall survival were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models. Results: Overall, there was no association between any of the 7 dietary indices (representing prediagnosis diet) evaluated and survival; however, associations differed by tumor stage. Although there were no consistent associations among those with advanced disease, among those with earlier stage (local/regional) disease, higher scores on the alternate Healthy Eating Index (aHR quartile 4 compared with 1 = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.50, 0.87), Healthy Eating Index-2015 (aHR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.59, 0.97), and alternate Mediterranean diet (aHR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.60, 0.98) were associated with better survival. Better survival was also observed for individuals with early-stage disease who reported higher intakes of dietary components that contribute to the healthy diet indices (aHR for Q4 compared with Q1: vegetables 0.71; 95% CI: 0.56, 0.91), tomatoes (aHR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.57, 0.91) and nuts and seeds (aHR 0.71; 95% CI: 0.55, 0.92). In contrast, there were suggestions of worse survival with higher scores on 2 of the 3 inflammatory indices and higher intake of trans-fatty acids. Conclusions: Adherence to a more healthy, less-inflammatory diet may confer a survival benefit for individuals with early-stage ovarian cancer.
KW - diet
KW - diet quality
KW - foods
KW - nutrients
KW - ovarian cancer
KW - survival
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85218859063&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2025.02.004
DO - 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2025.02.004
M3 - Article
C2 - 39921094
AN - SCOPUS:85218859063
SN - 0002-9165
VL - 121
SP - 758
EP - 768
JO - American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
JF - American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
IS - 4
ER -