TY - JOUR
T1 - Device-Related Thrombus After Left Atrial Appendage Closure
T2 - Data on Thrombus Characteristics, Treatment Strategies, and Clinical Outcomes From the EUROC-DRT-Registry
AU - Sedaghat, Alexander
AU - Vij, Vivian
AU - Al-Kassou, Baravan
AU - Gloekler, Steffen
AU - Galea, Roberto
AU - Fürholz, Monika
AU - Meier, Bernhard
AU - Valgimigli, Marco
AU - O'Hara, Gilles
AU - Arzamendi, Dabit
AU - Agudelo, Victor
AU - Asmarats, Lluis
AU - Freixa, Xavier
AU - Flores-Umanzor, Eduardo
AU - De Backer, Ole
AU - Søndergaard, Lars
AU - Nombela-Franco, Luis
AU - McInerney, Angela
AU - Korsholm, Kaspar
AU - Nielsen-Kudsk, Jens Erik
AU - Afzal, Shazia
AU - Zeus, Tobias
AU - Operhalski, Felix
AU - Schmidt, Boris
AU - Montalescot, Gilles
AU - Guedeney, Paul
AU - Iriart, Xavier
AU - Miton, Noelie
AU - Saw, Jacqueline
AU - Gilhofer, Thomas
AU - Fauchier, Laurent
AU - Veliqi, Egzon
AU - Meincke, Felix
AU - Petri, Nils
AU - Nordbeck, Peter
AU - Rycerz, Szymon
AU - Ognerubov, Dmitrii
AU - Merkulov, Evgeny
AU - Cruz-González, Ignacio
AU - Gonzalez-Ferreiro, Rocio
AU - Bhatt, Deepak L.
AU - Laricchia, Alessandra
AU - Mangieri, Antonio
AU - Omran, Heyder
AU - Schrickel, Jan Wilko
AU - Rodes-Cabau, Josep
AU - Nickenig, Georg
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/5/1
Y1 - 2021/5/1
N2 - Background: Left atrial appendage closure is an established therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation. Although device-related thrombosis (DRT) is relatively rare, it is potentially linked to adverse events. As data on DRT characteristics, outcome, and treatment regimen are scarce, we aimed to assess these questions in a multicenter approach. Methods: One hundred fifty-six patients with the diagnosis of DRT after left atrial appendage closure were included in the multinational EUROC-DRT registry. Baseline characteristics included clinical and echocardiographic data. After inclusion, all patients underwent further clinical and echocardiographic follow-up to assess DRT dynamics, treatment success, and outcome. Results: DRT was detected after a median of 93 days (interquartile range, 54-161 days) with 17.9% being detected >6 months after left atrial appendage closure. Patients with DRT were at high ischemic and bleeding risk (CHA2DS2-VASc 4.5±1.7, HAS-BLED 3.3±1.2) and had nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation (67.3%), previous stroke (53.8%), and spontaneous echo contrast (50.6%). The initial treatment regimens showed comparable resolution rates (antiplatelet monotherapy: 57.1%, dual antiplatelet therapy: 85.7%, vitamin K antagonists: 80.0%, novel oral anticoagulants: 75.0%, and heparin: 68.6%). After intensification or switch of treatment, complete DRT resolution was achieved in 79.5% of patients. Two-year follow-up revealed a high risk of mortality (20.0%) and ischemic stroke (13.8%) in patients with DRT. Patients with incomplete DRT resolution showed numerically higher stroke rates and increased mortality rates (stroke: 17.6% versus 12.3%, P=0.29; mortality: 31.3% versus 13.1%, P=0.05). Conclusions: A substantial proportion of DRT is detected >6 months after left atrial appendage closure, highlighting the need for imaging follow-up. Patients with DRT appear to be at a high risk for stroke and mortality. While DRT resolution was achieved in most patients, incomplete DRT resolution appeared to identify patients at even higher risk. Optimal DRT diagnostic criteria and treatment regimens are warranted.
AB - Background: Left atrial appendage closure is an established therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation. Although device-related thrombosis (DRT) is relatively rare, it is potentially linked to adverse events. As data on DRT characteristics, outcome, and treatment regimen are scarce, we aimed to assess these questions in a multicenter approach. Methods: One hundred fifty-six patients with the diagnosis of DRT after left atrial appendage closure were included in the multinational EUROC-DRT registry. Baseline characteristics included clinical and echocardiographic data. After inclusion, all patients underwent further clinical and echocardiographic follow-up to assess DRT dynamics, treatment success, and outcome. Results: DRT was detected after a median of 93 days (interquartile range, 54-161 days) with 17.9% being detected >6 months after left atrial appendage closure. Patients with DRT were at high ischemic and bleeding risk (CHA2DS2-VASc 4.5±1.7, HAS-BLED 3.3±1.2) and had nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation (67.3%), previous stroke (53.8%), and spontaneous echo contrast (50.6%). The initial treatment regimens showed comparable resolution rates (antiplatelet monotherapy: 57.1%, dual antiplatelet therapy: 85.7%, vitamin K antagonists: 80.0%, novel oral anticoagulants: 75.0%, and heparin: 68.6%). After intensification or switch of treatment, complete DRT resolution was achieved in 79.5% of patients. Two-year follow-up revealed a high risk of mortality (20.0%) and ischemic stroke (13.8%) in patients with DRT. Patients with incomplete DRT resolution showed numerically higher stroke rates and increased mortality rates (stroke: 17.6% versus 12.3%, P=0.29; mortality: 31.3% versus 13.1%, P=0.05). Conclusions: A substantial proportion of DRT is detected >6 months after left atrial appendage closure, highlighting the need for imaging follow-up. Patients with DRT appear to be at a high risk for stroke and mortality. While DRT resolution was achieved in most patients, incomplete DRT resolution appeared to identify patients at even higher risk. Optimal DRT diagnostic criteria and treatment regimens are warranted.
KW - atrial appendage
KW - atrial fibrillation
KW - echocardiography
KW - heparin
KW - thrombosis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85106170484&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.010195
DO - 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.010195
M3 - Article
C2 - 34003661
AN - SCOPUS:85106170484
SN - 1941-7640
VL - 14
SP - E010195
JO - Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions
JF - Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions
IS - 5
ER -