Abstract
A biochemical definition and classification system for acute renal dysfunction is long overdue. Its absence has impeded progress in clinical and even basic research concerning a syndrome associated with mortality rates of 30 to 80%. No definition of acute renal dysfunction will be perfect, but the absence of a definition or, worse, more than 35 separate definitions, as found in the literature, is unacceptable. Many of the challenges, considerations, and controversies associated with achieving consensus and developing a classification for acute renal dysfunction are addressed. Recommendations for validating a classification system are also considered.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 509-514 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Current Opinion in Critical Care |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Dec 2002 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Developing a consensus classification system for acute renal failure'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver