Detection, prediction, and significance of perioperative myocardial infarction following aorta-coronary bypass

  • W. H. Fennell
  • , K. G. Chua
  • , L. Cohen
  • , J. Morgan
  • , H. B. Karunaratne
  • , L. Resnekov
  • , J. Al-Sadir
  • , C. Y. Lin
  • , J. J. Lamberti
  • , C. E. Anagnostopoulos

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

25 Scopus citations

Abstract

100 Consecutive patients undergoing aorta-coronary bypass grafting (ACBG) alone, without ventricular venting, were prospectively studied to determine the incidence and consequence of perioperative myocardial infarction (PMI) and the clinical variables that were predictive of PMI. Incidence was determined by serial electrocardiography (ECG) (100 patients; serum CK, GOT, and LDH (100 patients), CK isoenzymes (qualitative 100 patients, quantitated 50 patients); vectorcardiography (VCG) (78 patients); and 99mtechnetium pyrophosphate scintigraphy (TcPyp) (52 patients). The incidence of diagnostic change by VCG was 19% and by scintigraphy, 25%. Using at least one changed variable of the remaining three as the reference standard, the relative sensitivity and relative specificity of given variables in the diagnosis of PMI were as follows: ECG 67% and 100%, respectively; VCG 85% and 94%; scintigraphy 92% and 97%; and serum enzymes 86% and 96%. By univariate analysis, unstable angina was the only significant predictor of PMI. The operative mortality rate was 2% and the mortality rate at 12 months was 5%. There was a significantly greater mortality rate in patients with PMI diagnosed by ECG (p < 0.01), in patients with unstable angina pectoris before operation (p < 0.05), and in women (p < 0.05).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)244-253
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Volume78
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1979
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Detection, prediction, and significance of perioperative myocardial infarction following aorta-coronary bypass'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this