TY - JOUR
T1 - Dermatology Match Preference Signaling Tokens
T2 - Impact and Implications
AU - Dirr, McKenzie A.
AU - Brownstone, Nicholas
AU - Zakria, Danny
AU - Rigel, Darrell
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2022 by the American Society for Dermatologic Surgery, Inc. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022/12/1
Y1 - 2022/12/1
N2 - BACKGROUND: The dermatology residency application process implemented a new system of preference signaling tokens (PSTs) in the 2021-2022 cycle to allow applicants to express a higher level of interest in specific programs. Limited data are available on the utilization and impact of these tokens. OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of PSTs on the application process and where in the process PSTs had the greatest influence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 14-question survey was sent to 62 ACGME-accredited dermatology residency programs. Primary outcomes were PST impact on 2021-2022 applications. Variables were evaluated using open-ended questions, yes/no responses, and importance ratings from 0 to 100. RESULTS: An average of 7.1% of applicants were offered interviews, but 21.1% of applicants that submitted PSTs were interviewed versus 3.7% of nonsubmitters. 22.5% of ranked applicants and 19% of matched applicants submitted a PST to that program. LIMITATIONS: Not all programs responded, and PST submission restrictions could not be assessed. CONCLUSION: The greatest PST impact was on the interview decision but had minimal subsequent impact. Given PSTs cannot be submitted to home programs or in-person away rotations, the actual impact was probably greater than found. Programs will continue to implement PSTs in future cycles.
AB - BACKGROUND: The dermatology residency application process implemented a new system of preference signaling tokens (PSTs) in the 2021-2022 cycle to allow applicants to express a higher level of interest in specific programs. Limited data are available on the utilization and impact of these tokens. OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of PSTs on the application process and where in the process PSTs had the greatest influence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 14-question survey was sent to 62 ACGME-accredited dermatology residency programs. Primary outcomes were PST impact on 2021-2022 applications. Variables were evaluated using open-ended questions, yes/no responses, and importance ratings from 0 to 100. RESULTS: An average of 7.1% of applicants were offered interviews, but 21.1% of applicants that submitted PSTs were interviewed versus 3.7% of nonsubmitters. 22.5% of ranked applicants and 19% of matched applicants submitted a PST to that program. LIMITATIONS: Not all programs responded, and PST submission restrictions could not be assessed. CONCLUSION: The greatest PST impact was on the interview decision but had minimal subsequent impact. Given PSTs cannot be submitted to home programs or in-person away rotations, the actual impact was probably greater than found. Programs will continue to implement PSTs in future cycles.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85143108665&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/DSS.0000000000003645
DO - 10.1097/DSS.0000000000003645
M3 - Letter
C2 - 36449885
AN - SCOPUS:85143108665
SN - 1076-0512
VL - 48
SP - 1367
EP - 1368
JO - Dermatologic Surgery
JF - Dermatologic Surgery
IS - 12
ER -