TY - JOUR
T1 - Depression and bipolar support alliance consensus statement on the unmet needs in diagnosis and treatment of mood disorders in late life
AU - Charney, Dennis S.
AU - Reynolds, Charles F.
AU - Lewis, Lydia
AU - Lebowitz, Barry D.
AU - Sunderland, Trey
AU - Alexopoulos, George S.
AU - Blazer, Dan G.
AU - Katz, Ira R.
AU - Meyers, Barnett S.
AU - Arean, Patricia A.
AU - Borson, Soo
AU - Brown, Charlotte
AU - Bruce, Martha L.
AU - Callahan, Christopher M.
AU - Charlson, Mary E.
AU - Conwell, Yeates
AU - Cuthbert, Bruce N.
AU - Devanand, D. P.
AU - Gibson, Mary Jo
AU - Gottlieb, Gary L.
AU - Krishnan, K. Ranga
AU - Laden, Sally K.
AU - Lyketsos, Constantine G.
AU - Mulsant, Benoit H.
AU - Niederehe, George
AU - Olin, Jason T.
AU - Oslin, David W.
AU - Pearson, Jane
AU - Persky, Trudy
AU - Pollock, Bruce G.
AU - Raetzman, Susan
AU - Reynolds, Mildred
AU - Salzman, Carl
AU - Schulz, Richard
AU - Schwenk, Thomas L.
AU - Scolnick, Edward
AU - Unützer, Jürgen
AU - Weissman, Myrna M.
AU - Young, Robert C.
PY - 2003/7/1
Y1 - 2003/7/1
N2 - Objectives: To review progress made during the past decade in late-life mood disorders and to identify areas of unmet need in health care delivery and research. Participants: The Consensus Development Panel consisted of experts in late-life mood disorders, geriatrics, primary care, mental health and aging policy research, and advocacy. Evidence: (1) Literature reviews addressing risk factors, prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and delivery of services and (2) opinions and experiences of primary care and mental health care providers, policy analysts, and advocates. Consensus Process: The Consensus Development Panel listened to presentations and participated in discussions. Workgroups considered the evidence and prepared preliminary statements. Workgroup leaders presented drafts for discussion by the Consensus Development Panel. The final document was reviewed and edited to incorporate input from the entire Consensus Development Panel. Conclusions: Despite the availability of safe and efficacious treatments, mood disorders remain a significant health care issue for the elderly and are associated with disability, functional decline, diminished quality of life, mortality from comorbid medical conditions or suicide, demands on caregivers, and increased service utilization. Discriminatory coverage and reimbursement policies for mental health care are a challenge for the elderly, especially those with modest incomes, and for clinicians. Minorities are particularly underserved. Access to mental health care services for most elderly individuals is inadequate, and coordination of services is lacking. There is an immediate need for collaboration among patients, families, researchers, clinicians, governmental agencies, and third-party payers to improve diagnosis, treatment, and delivery of services for elderly persons with mood disorders.
AB - Objectives: To review progress made during the past decade in late-life mood disorders and to identify areas of unmet need in health care delivery and research. Participants: The Consensus Development Panel consisted of experts in late-life mood disorders, geriatrics, primary care, mental health and aging policy research, and advocacy. Evidence: (1) Literature reviews addressing risk factors, prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and delivery of services and (2) opinions and experiences of primary care and mental health care providers, policy analysts, and advocates. Consensus Process: The Consensus Development Panel listened to presentations and participated in discussions. Workgroups considered the evidence and prepared preliminary statements. Workgroup leaders presented drafts for discussion by the Consensus Development Panel. The final document was reviewed and edited to incorporate input from the entire Consensus Development Panel. Conclusions: Despite the availability of safe and efficacious treatments, mood disorders remain a significant health care issue for the elderly and are associated with disability, functional decline, diminished quality of life, mortality from comorbid medical conditions or suicide, demands on caregivers, and increased service utilization. Discriminatory coverage and reimbursement policies for mental health care are a challenge for the elderly, especially those with modest incomes, and for clinicians. Minorities are particularly underserved. Access to mental health care services for most elderly individuals is inadequate, and coordination of services is lacking. There is an immediate need for collaboration among patients, families, researchers, clinicians, governmental agencies, and third-party payers to improve diagnosis, treatment, and delivery of services for elderly persons with mood disorders.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037678633&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1001/archpsyc.60.7.664
DO - 10.1001/archpsyc.60.7.664
M3 - Review article
C2 - 12860770
AN - SCOPUS:0037678633
SN - 2168-622X
VL - 60
SP - 664
EP - 672
JO - JAMA Psychiatry
JF - JAMA Psychiatry
IS - 7
ER -