Defining the clinical course of multiple sclerosis: Results of an international survey

Fred D. Lublin, Stephen C. Reingold

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

3344 Scopus citations

Abstract

Standardization of terminology used to describe the pattern and course of MS is essential for mutual understanding between clinicians and investigators. It is particularly important in design of, and recruitment for, clinical trials statistically powered for expected outcomes for given patient populations with narrowly defined entry criteria. For agents that prove safe and effective for MS, knowledge of the patient populations in definitive clinical trials assists clinicians in determining who may ultimately benefit from use of the medication. An international survey of clinicians involved with MS revealed areas of consensus about some terms classically used to describe types of the disease and other areas for which there was lack of consensus. In this report, we provide a summary of the survey results and propose standardized definitions for the most common clinical courses of patients with MS.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)907-911
Number of pages5
JournalNeurology
Volume46
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1996
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Defining the clinical course of multiple sclerosis: Results of an international survey'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this