Defining ruxolitinib failure and transition to next-line therapy for patients with myelofibrosis: a modified Delphi panel consensus study

John Mascarenhas, Hiep Nguyen, Ashley Saunders, Louisa Oliver, Hannah Tomkinson, Richard Perry, Ali McBride

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Aim: To define ruxolitinib failure and develop parameters to guide transition to next-line therapy for patients with myelofibrosis. Methods: A modified Delphi panel with 14 hematologists-oncologists. Survey concepts included defining primary refractory status, loss of response, disease progression, intolerance and transition to next-line therapy. Results: Ruxolitinib failure may be defined as no improvement in symptoms or spleen size, progressive disease or ruxolitinib intolerance, following a maximally tolerated dose for ≥3 months. Loss of spleen response 1 month after initial response may prompt discontinuation. Lack of evidence to inform transition to next-line therapy was noted; tapering ruxolitinib should be considered according to ruxolitinib dose and patient characteristics. Conclusion: Expert consensus was provided on defining ruxolitinib failure and transition to next-line therapy as summarized in this position paper, which may support considerations in the development of future clinical practice guidelines.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)763-773
Number of pages11
JournalFuture Oncology
Volume19
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Apr 2023

Keywords

  • expert consensus
  • modified Delphi panel
  • myelofibrosis
  • ruxolitinib failure
  • transition to next-line therapy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Defining ruxolitinib failure and transition to next-line therapy for patients with myelofibrosis: a modified Delphi panel consensus study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this