Abstract
Aim: To define ruxolitinib failure and develop parameters to guide transition to next-line therapy for patients with myelofibrosis. Methods: A modified Delphi panel with 14 hematologists-oncologists. Survey concepts included defining primary refractory status, loss of response, disease progression, intolerance and transition to next-line therapy. Results: Ruxolitinib failure may be defined as no improvement in symptoms or spleen size, progressive disease or ruxolitinib intolerance, following a maximally tolerated dose for ≥3 months. Loss of spleen response 1 month after initial response may prompt discontinuation. Lack of evidence to inform transition to next-line therapy was noted; tapering ruxolitinib should be considered according to ruxolitinib dose and patient characteristics. Conclusion: Expert consensus was provided on defining ruxolitinib failure and transition to next-line therapy as summarized in this position paper, which may support considerations in the development of future clinical practice guidelines.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 763-773 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | Future Oncology |
Volume | 19 |
Issue number | 11 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 1 Apr 2023 |
Keywords
- expert consensus
- modified Delphi panel
- myelofibrosis
- ruxolitinib failure
- transition to next-line therapy