Abstract
The model for capacity assessment in the United States and much of the Western world relies upon the demonstration of four skills including the ability to communicate a clear, consistent choice. Yet such assessments often occur at only one moment in time, which may result in the patient expressing a choice to the evaluator that is highly inconsistent with the patient's underlying values and goals, especially if a short-term factor (such as frustration with the hospital staff) distorts the patient's preferences momentarily. These challenges are particularly concerning in cases, which arise frequently in hospital settings, in which patients demand immediate self-discharge, often during off-hours, while faced with life-threatening risks. This paper examines the distinctive elements that shape such cases and explores their ethical implications, ultimately offering a model for such situations that can be operationalized.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 260-266 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics |
| Volume | 33 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 27 Apr 2024 |
Keywords
- Capacity
- against medical advice
- consult-liaison psychiatry
- psychiatry
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Decisional Capacity after Dark: Is Autonomy Delayed Truly Autonomy Denied?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver