Decisional Capacity after Dark: Is Autonomy Delayed Truly Autonomy Denied?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The model for capacity assessment in the United States and much of the Western world relies upon the demonstration of four skills including the ability to communicate a clear, consistent choice. Yet such assessments often occur at only one moment in time, which may result in the patient expressing a choice to the evaluator that is highly inconsistent with the patient's underlying values and goals, especially if a short-term factor (such as frustration with the hospital staff) distorts the patient's preferences momentarily. These challenges are particularly concerning in cases, which arise frequently in hospital settings, in which patients demand immediate self-discharge, often during off-hours, while faced with life-threatening risks. This paper examines the distinctive elements that shape such cases and explores their ethical implications, ultimately offering a model for such situations that can be operationalized.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)260-266
Number of pages7
JournalCambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics
Volume33
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 27 Apr 2024

Keywords

  • Capacity
  • against medical advice
  • consult-liaison psychiatry
  • psychiatry

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Decisional Capacity after Dark: Is Autonomy Delayed Truly Autonomy Denied?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this