TY - JOUR
T1 - De-risking immunotherapy
T2 - Report of a consensus workshop of the cancer immunotherapy consortium of the cancer research institute
AU - Mellman, Ira
AU - Hubbard-Lucey, Vanessa M.
AU - Tontonoz, Matthew J.
AU - Kalos, Michael D.
AU - Chen, Daniel S.
AU - Allison, James P.
AU - Drake, Charles G.
AU - Levitsky, Hy
AU - Lonberg, Nils
AU - Van Der Burg, Sjoerd H.
AU - Fearon, Douglas T.
AU - Wherry, E. John
AU - Lowy, Israel
AU - Hvonderheide, Robert
AU - Hwu, Patrick
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 AACR.
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - With the recent FDA approvals of pembrolizumab and nivolumab, and a host of additional immunomodulatory agents entering clinical development each year, the field of cancer immunotherapy is changing rapidly. Strategies that can assist researchers in choosing the most promising drugs and drug combinations to move forward through clinical development are badly needed in order to reduce the likelihood of late-stage clinical trial failures. On October 5, 2014, the Cancer Immunotherapy Consortium of the Cancer Research Institute, a collaborative think tank composed of stakeholders from academia, industry, regulatory agencies, and patient interest groups, met to discuss strategies for de-risking immunotherapy development, with a focus on integrating preclinical and clinical studies, and conducting smarter early-phase trials, particularly for combination therapies. Several recommendations were made, including making better use of clinical data to inform preclinical research, obtaining adequate tissues for biomarker studies, and choosing appropriate clinical trial endpoints to identify promising drug candidates and combinations in nonrandomized early-phase trials.
AB - With the recent FDA approvals of pembrolizumab and nivolumab, and a host of additional immunomodulatory agents entering clinical development each year, the field of cancer immunotherapy is changing rapidly. Strategies that can assist researchers in choosing the most promising drugs and drug combinations to move forward through clinical development are badly needed in order to reduce the likelihood of late-stage clinical trial failures. On October 5, 2014, the Cancer Immunotherapy Consortium of the Cancer Research Institute, a collaborative think tank composed of stakeholders from academia, industry, regulatory agencies, and patient interest groups, met to discuss strategies for de-risking immunotherapy development, with a focus on integrating preclinical and clinical studies, and conducting smarter early-phase trials, particularly for combination therapies. Several recommendations were made, including making better use of clinical data to inform preclinical research, obtaining adequate tissues for biomarker studies, and choosing appropriate clinical trial endpoints to identify promising drug candidates and combinations in nonrandomized early-phase trials.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85016505041&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-16-0045
DO - 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-16-0045
M3 - Article
C2 - 27036972
AN - SCOPUS:85016505041
SN - 2326-6066
VL - 4
SP - 279
EP - 288
JO - Cancer Immunology Research
JF - Cancer Immunology Research
IS - 4
ER -