TY - JOUR
T1 - Daratumumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone versus lenalidomide and dexamethasone in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma
T2 - Updated analysis of POLLUX
AU - Dimopoulos, Meletios A.
AU - San-Miguel, Jesus
AU - Belch, Andrew
AU - White, Darrell
AU - Benboubker, Lotfi
AU - Cook, Gordon
AU - Leiba, Merav
AU - Morton, James
AU - Joy Ho, P.
AU - Kim, Kihyun
AU - Takezako, Naoki
AU - Moreau, Philippe
AU - Kaufman, Jonathan L.
AU - Sutherland, Heather J.
AU - Lalancette, Marc
AU - Magen, Hila
AU - Iida, Shinsuke
AU - Kim, Jin Seok
AU - Miles Prince, H.
AU - Cochrane, Tara
AU - Oriol, Albert
AU - Bahlis, Nizar J.
AU - Chari, Ajai
AU - O’Rourke, Lisa
AU - Wu, Kaida
AU - Schecter, Jordan M.
AU - Casneuf, Tineke
AU - Chiu, Christopher
AU - Soong, David
AU - Kate Sasser, A.
AU - Khokhar, Nushmia Z.
AU - Avet-Loiseau, Hervé
AU - Usmani, Saad Z.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Ferrata Storti Foundation.
PY - 2018/11/30
Y1 - 2018/11/30
N2 - In the POLLUX study, daratumumab plus lenalidomide/dexamethasone significantly reduced risk of progression/death versus lenalidomide/ dexamethasone alone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. We provide one additional year of follow up and include the effect on minimal residual disease and in clinically relevant subgroups. After 25.4 months of follow up, daratumumab plus lenalidomide/dexamethasone prolonged progression-free survival versus lenalidomide/dexamethasone alone (median not reached vs. 17.5 months; hazard ratio, 0.41; 95% confidence interval, 0.31-0.53; P<0.0001). The overall response rate was 92.9% versus 76.4%, and 51.2% versus 21.0% achieved a complete response or better, respectively (both P<0.0001). At the 10–5 sensitivity threshold, 26.2% versus 6.4% were minimal residual disease–negative, respectively (P<0.0001). Post hoc analyses of clinically relevant patient subgroups demonstrated that progression-free survival was significantly prolonged for daratumumab plus lenalidomide/dexamethasone versus lenalidomide/dexamethasone regardless of number of prior lines of therapy. Patients previously treated with lenalidomide or thalidomide and those refractory to bortezomib received similar benefits (all P<0.01). Treatment benefit with daratumumab plus lenalidomide/dexamethasone was maintained in high-risk patients (median progression-free survival 22.6 vs. 10.2 months; hazard ratio, 0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.25-1.13; P=0.0921) and patients with treatment-free intervals of >12 and ≤12 months and >6 and ≤6 months. No new safety signals were observed. In relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients, daratumumab plus lenalidomide/dexamethasone continued to improve progression-free survival and deepen responses versus lenalidomide/dexamethasone.
AB - In the POLLUX study, daratumumab plus lenalidomide/dexamethasone significantly reduced risk of progression/death versus lenalidomide/ dexamethasone alone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. We provide one additional year of follow up and include the effect on minimal residual disease and in clinically relevant subgroups. After 25.4 months of follow up, daratumumab plus lenalidomide/dexamethasone prolonged progression-free survival versus lenalidomide/dexamethasone alone (median not reached vs. 17.5 months; hazard ratio, 0.41; 95% confidence interval, 0.31-0.53; P<0.0001). The overall response rate was 92.9% versus 76.4%, and 51.2% versus 21.0% achieved a complete response or better, respectively (both P<0.0001). At the 10–5 sensitivity threshold, 26.2% versus 6.4% were minimal residual disease–negative, respectively (P<0.0001). Post hoc analyses of clinically relevant patient subgroups demonstrated that progression-free survival was significantly prolonged for daratumumab plus lenalidomide/dexamethasone versus lenalidomide/dexamethasone regardless of number of prior lines of therapy. Patients previously treated with lenalidomide or thalidomide and those refractory to bortezomib received similar benefits (all P<0.01). Treatment benefit with daratumumab plus lenalidomide/dexamethasone was maintained in high-risk patients (median progression-free survival 22.6 vs. 10.2 months; hazard ratio, 0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.25-1.13; P=0.0921) and patients with treatment-free intervals of >12 and ≤12 months and >6 and ≤6 months. No new safety signals were observed. In relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients, daratumumab plus lenalidomide/dexamethasone continued to improve progression-free survival and deepen responses versus lenalidomide/dexamethasone.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058407353&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3324/haematol.2018.194282
DO - 10.3324/haematol.2018.194282
M3 - Article
C2 - 30237262
AN - SCOPUS:85058407353
SN - 0390-6078
VL - 103
SP - 2088
EP - 2096
JO - Haematologica
JF - Haematologica
IS - 12
ER -