Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Cytomorphology is often insufficient to categorize non-small-cell lung carcinoma on FNA specimens

  • Benjamin L. Witt
  • , Michael B. Cohen
  • , Barbara E. Chadwick
  • , Philip D. Stephenson
  • , Peter Abasolo
  • , Robert L. Schmidt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives To determine the accuracy and reproducibility of differentiating between squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma (ADC) on fine-needle aspiration (FNA) specimens. Methods Fifty cases of NSCLC diagnosed by FNA having either concurrent core biopsies or resection as a diagnostic reference standard were selected. FNA slides were reviewed independently by five blinded observers. Two rounds of review were performed. Cases were initially categorized as SCC, favor SCC, NSCLC (type indeterminate), favor ADC, or ADC; while the indeterminate category was eliminated in the second round of review. Results The interobserver agreement was 0.22 and 0.1 with and without the indeterminate category, respectively. The overall accuracy for differentiating between SCC and ADC of the lung was 65% with the indeterminate category and 66% without. Conclusion Overall, the low interobserver agreement in our study indicates that accurate subclassification between the NSCLCs often cannot be made by cytomorphology alone. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2016;44:73-79.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)73-79
Number of pages7
JournalDiagnostic Cytopathology
Volume44
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Feb 2016
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • FNA
  • accuracy
  • agreement
  • non-small-cell lung carcinoma

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cytomorphology is often insufficient to categorize non-small-cell lung carcinoma on FNA specimens'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this