TY - JOUR
T1 - Current Methods of Tissue Extraction in Minimally Invasive Surgical Treatment of Uterine Fibroids
AU - Kim, Renita
AU - Pepin, Kristen
AU - Dmello, Monalisa
AU - Clark, Nisse
AU - Ajao, Mobolaji
AU - Einarsson, Jon
AU - Rassier, Sarah Cohen
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 by SLS, Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons. Published by the Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons.
PY - 2022/7/1
Y1 - 2022/7/1
N2 - Background and Objectives: Since the 2014 Food and Drug Administration communication regarding the use of power morcellation, gynecologists have adopted alterna-tive tissue extraction strategies. The objective of this study is to investigate the current techniques used by gynecologic surgeons for tissue extraction following minimally invasive hysterectomy or myomectomy for fibroids. Methods: An online survey was distributed to all AAGL members and responses were collected between March 26, 2019 and April 17, 2019. Results: Four hundred thirty-six respondents completed the survey. For hysterectomy, the most common methods of tissue extraction were manual morcellation through the colpotomy (72.4%) or minilaparotomy (66.9%). Nearly one-third (31.7%) endorsed using power morcellation. For myo-mectomy, manual morcellation via minilaparotomy (71.9%) was the most common approach, followed by power morcellation (35.7%). Use of containment bags was com-mon. Minilaparotomy incisions were typically three cm and most often at the umbilicus. Geographic differences were detected, particularly with power morcellation. During hysterectomy, 18.4% of US-based surgeons reported its use, compared to 56.9% of nonUS-based surgeons. During myomectomy, 20.5% of US-based surgeons reported its use compared to 67.5% of their international counterparts. Age, years in practice, fellowship training, and practice location were all significantly associated with power morcellator use. Conclusion: A large majority of practitioners are perform-ing manual morcellation through the colpotomy or minila-parotomy. Use of containment bags is common with all routes of tissue removal. Power morcellation use is less common in the United States than in other countries.
AB - Background and Objectives: Since the 2014 Food and Drug Administration communication regarding the use of power morcellation, gynecologists have adopted alterna-tive tissue extraction strategies. The objective of this study is to investigate the current techniques used by gynecologic surgeons for tissue extraction following minimally invasive hysterectomy or myomectomy for fibroids. Methods: An online survey was distributed to all AAGL members and responses were collected between March 26, 2019 and April 17, 2019. Results: Four hundred thirty-six respondents completed the survey. For hysterectomy, the most common methods of tissue extraction were manual morcellation through the colpotomy (72.4%) or minilaparotomy (66.9%). Nearly one-third (31.7%) endorsed using power morcellation. For myo-mectomy, manual morcellation via minilaparotomy (71.9%) was the most common approach, followed by power morcellation (35.7%). Use of containment bags was com-mon. Minilaparotomy incisions were typically three cm and most often at the umbilicus. Geographic differences were detected, particularly with power morcellation. During hysterectomy, 18.4% of US-based surgeons reported its use, compared to 56.9% of nonUS-based surgeons. During myomectomy, 20.5% of US-based surgeons reported its use compared to 67.5% of their international counterparts. Age, years in practice, fellowship training, and practice location were all significantly associated with power morcellator use. Conclusion: A large majority of practitioners are perform-ing manual morcellation through the colpotomy or minila-parotomy. Use of containment bags is common with all routes of tissue removal. Power morcellation use is less common in the United States than in other countries.
KW - Leiomyoma
KW - Morcellation
KW - Survey
KW - Tissue extraction
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85137418637
U2 - 10.4293/JSLS.2022.00036
DO - 10.4293/JSLS.2022.00036
M3 - Article
C2 - 36071994
AN - SCOPUS:85137418637
SN - 1086-8089
VL - 26
JO - Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgeons
JF - Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgeons
IS - 3
M1 - e2022.00036
ER -