TY - JOUR
T1 - CT screening for lung cancer
AU - Henschke, Claudia I.
AU - Yankelevitz, David F.
PY - 2000
Y1 - 2000
N2 - Recommendations against screening for lung cancer were based on the lack of a reduction in mortality of the screened group as compared with the control group in randomized control trials. These results were interpreted as showing that early detection of lung cancer as a result of screening did not decrease the mortality rate compared with detection after presentation of symptoms for the populations being screened. Evidence, however, shows that earlier-stage intervention leads to substantially higher rates of survival. Screening, therefore, is an effective means to prevent deaths from this otherwise fatal disease. This article discusses the evidence of both CT and chest radiograph screening.
AB - Recommendations against screening for lung cancer were based on the lack of a reduction in mortality of the screened group as compared with the control group in randomized control trials. These results were interpreted as showing that early detection of lung cancer as a result of screening did not decrease the mortality rate compared with detection after presentation of symptoms for the populations being screened. Evidence, however, shows that earlier-stage intervention leads to substantially higher rates of survival. Screening, therefore, is an effective means to prevent deaths from this otherwise fatal disease. This article discusses the evidence of both CT and chest radiograph screening.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034121805&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0033-8389(05)70179-2
DO - 10.1016/S0033-8389(05)70179-2
M3 - Article
C2 - 10855256
AN - SCOPUS:0034121805
SN - 0033-8389
VL - 38
SP - 487
EP - 495
JO - Radiologic Clinics of North America
JF - Radiologic Clinics of North America
IS - 3
ER -