Craniofacial Soft-Tissue Anthropomorphic Database with Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Unbiased Diffeomorphic Registration

Background: Objective assessment of craniofacial surgery outcomes in a pediatric population is challenging because of the complexity of patient presentations, diversity of procedures performed, and rapid craniofacial growth. There is a paucity of robust methods to quantify anatomical measurements by age and objectively compare craniofacial dysmorphology and postoperative outcomes. Here, the authors present data in developing a racially and ethnically sensitive anthropomorphic database, providing plastic and craniofacial surgeons with "normal" three-dimensional anatomical parameters with which to appraise and optimize aesthetic and reconstructive outcomes. Methods: Patients with normal craniofacial anatomy undergoing head magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans from 2008 to 2021 were included in this retrospective study. Images were used to construct composite (template) images with diffeomorphic image registration method using the Advanced Normalization Tools package. Composites were thresholded to generate binary three-dimensional segmentations used for anatomical measurements in Materalise Mimics. Results: High-resolution MRI scans from 130 patients generated 12 composites from an average of 10 MRI sequences each: four 3-year-olds, four 4-year-olds, and four 5-year-olds (two male, two female, two Black, and two White). The average head circumference of 3-, 4-, and 5-year-old composites was 50.3, 51.5, and 51.7 cm, respectively, comparable to normative data published by the World Health Organization. Conclusions: Application of diffeomorphic registration-based image template algorithm to MRI is effective in creating composite templates to represent "normal" three-dimensional craniofacial and soft-tissue anatomy. Future research will focus on development of automated computational tools to characterize anatomical normality, generation of indices to grade preoperative severity, and quantification of postoperative results to reduce subjectivity bias.