TY - JOUR
T1 - COVID-19 outbreak in Italy
T2 - an opportunity to evaluate extended interval dosing of ocrelizumab in MS patients
AU - the OCREVID study group on behalf of the Italian MS Register
AU - Bisecco, Alvino
AU - Matrone, Federica
AU - Capobianco, Marco
AU - De Luca, Giovanna
AU - Filippi, Massimo
AU - Granella, Franco
AU - Lus, Giacomo
AU - Marfia, Girolama Alessandra
AU - Mirabella, Massimiliano
AU - Patti, Francesco
AU - Trojano, Maria
AU - Mascolo, Agnese
AU - Copetti, Massimiliano
AU - Tedeschi, Gioacchino
AU - Gallo, Antonio
AU - Malucchi, Simona
AU - Talentacci, Maria
AU - Tomassini, Valentina
AU - Farina, Deborah
AU - Moiola, Lucia
AU - Nozzolillo, Agostino
AU - Franceschini, Alessandro
AU - Minetti, Matteo
AU - Signoriello, Elisabetta
AU - Romano, Giuseppe
AU - Risi, Mario
AU - d’Ambrosio, Alessandro
AU - Landi, Doriana
AU - Nicoletti, Carolina Gabri
AU - Bianco, Assunta
AU - Lucchini, Matteo
AU - Chisari, Clara
AU - Toscano, Simona
AU - Paolicelli, Damiano
AU - Iaffaldano, Pietro
AU - Inglese, Matilde
AU - Cellerino, Maria
AU - Bellantonio, Paolo
AU - Fantozzi, Roberta
AU - Salemi, Giuseppe
AU - Ragonese, Paolo
AU - Danni, Maura
AU - Coniglio, Gabriella
AU - Ferraro, Diana
AU - Maniscalco, Giorgia Teresa
AU - Conte, Antonella
AU - Cavalla, Paola
AU - Vianello, Marika
AU - Cargnelutti, Daniela
AU - Gatto, Maurizia
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s).
PY - 2024/2
Y1 - 2024/2
N2 - Introduction: During the COVID-19 pandemic, ocrelizumab (OCR) infusions for MS patients were often re-scheduled because of MS center's disruption and concerns regarding immunosuppression. The aim of the present study was to assess changes in OCR schedule during the first wave of pandemic in Italy and to evaluate the effect of delayed infusion on clinical/radiological endpoints. Methods: Data were extracted from the Italian MS Register database. Standard interval dosing was defined as an infusion interval ≤ 30 weeks, while extended interval dosing was defined as an infusion interval > 30 weeks at the time of the observation period. Clinico-demographics variables were tested as potential predictors for treatment delay. Time to first relapse and time to first MRI event were evaluated. Cumulative hazard curves were reported along their 95% confidence intervals. A final sample of one-thousand two patients with MS from 65 centers was included in the analysis: 599 pwMS were selected to evaluate the modification of OCR infusion intervals, while 717 pwRMS were selected to analyze the effect of infusion delay on clinical/MRI activity. Results: Mean interval between two OCR infusions was 28.1 weeks before pandemic compared to 30.8 weeks during the observation period, with a mean delay of 2.74 weeks (p < 0.001). No clinico-demographic factors emerged as predictors of infusion postponement, except for location of MS centers in the North of Italy. Clinical relapses (4 in SID, 0 in EID) and 17 MRI activity reports (4 in SID, 13 in EID) were recorded during follow-up period. Discussion: Despite the significant extension of OCR infusion interval during the first wave of pandemic in Italy, a very small incidence of clinical/radiological events was observed, thus suggesting durable efficacy of OCR, as well as the absence of rebound after its short-term suspension.
AB - Introduction: During the COVID-19 pandemic, ocrelizumab (OCR) infusions for MS patients were often re-scheduled because of MS center's disruption and concerns regarding immunosuppression. The aim of the present study was to assess changes in OCR schedule during the first wave of pandemic in Italy and to evaluate the effect of delayed infusion on clinical/radiological endpoints. Methods: Data were extracted from the Italian MS Register database. Standard interval dosing was defined as an infusion interval ≤ 30 weeks, while extended interval dosing was defined as an infusion interval > 30 weeks at the time of the observation period. Clinico-demographics variables were tested as potential predictors for treatment delay. Time to first relapse and time to first MRI event were evaluated. Cumulative hazard curves were reported along their 95% confidence intervals. A final sample of one-thousand two patients with MS from 65 centers was included in the analysis: 599 pwMS were selected to evaluate the modification of OCR infusion intervals, while 717 pwRMS were selected to analyze the effect of infusion delay on clinical/MRI activity. Results: Mean interval between two OCR infusions was 28.1 weeks before pandemic compared to 30.8 weeks during the observation period, with a mean delay of 2.74 weeks (p < 0.001). No clinico-demographic factors emerged as predictors of infusion postponement, except for location of MS centers in the North of Italy. Clinical relapses (4 in SID, 0 in EID) and 17 MRI activity reports (4 in SID, 13 in EID) were recorded during follow-up period. Discussion: Despite the significant extension of OCR infusion interval during the first wave of pandemic in Italy, a very small incidence of clinical/radiological events was observed, thus suggesting durable efficacy of OCR, as well as the absence of rebound after its short-term suspension.
KW - COVID-19 Pandemic
KW - Extended interval dosing
KW - MS (multiple sclerosis)
KW - Ocrelizumab
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85177471214&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00415-023-12084-4
DO - 10.1007/s00415-023-12084-4
M3 - Article
C2 - 37982852
AN - SCOPUS:85177471214
SN - 0340-5354
VL - 271
SP - 699
EP - 710
JO - Journal of Neurology
JF - Journal of Neurology
IS - 2
ER -