Abstract
Background: Costs associated with early stages of Alzheimer's disease (AD; mild cognitive impairment [MCI] and mild dementia [MILD]) are understudied. Objective: To compare costs associated with MCI and MILD due to AD in the United States. Methods: Data included baseline patient/study partner medical history, healthcare resource utilization, and outcome assessments as part of a prospective cohort study. Direct, indirect, and total societal costs were derived by applying standardized unit costs to resources for the 1-month pre-baseline period (USD2017). Costs/month for MCI and MILD cohorts were compared using analysis of variance models. To strengthen the confidence of diagnosis, amyloid-β (Aβ) tests were included and analyses were replicated stratifying within each cohort by amyloid status [+/-]. Results: Patients (N=1327) with MILD versus MCI had higher total societal costs/month (4243 versus 2816; p<0.001). These costs were not significantly different within each severity cohort by amyloid status. The largest fraction of overall costs were informal caregiver costs (45.1%) for the MILD cohort, whereas direct medical patient costs were the largest for the MCI cohort (39.0%). Correspondingly, caregiver time spent on basic activities of daily living (ADLs), instrumental ADLs, and supervision time was twice as high for MILD versus MCI (all p<0.001). Conclusion: Early AD poses a financial burden, and despite higher functioning among those with MCI, caregivers were significantly impacted. The major cost driver was the patient's clinical cognitive-functional status and not amyloid status. Differences were primarily due to rising need for caregiver support.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 437-450 |
Number of pages | 14 |
Journal | Journal of Alzheimer's Disease |
Volume | 75 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2020 |
Keywords
- Amyloid
- burden of illness
- dementia
- economic burden
- florbetapir F18
- mild cognitive impairment
- societal burden