TY - JOUR
T1 - Correction to
T2 - Brain Morphological Characteristics of Cognitive Subgroups of Schizophrenia‑spectrum Disorders and Bipolar Disorder: a Systematic Review with Narrative Synthesis (Neuropsychology Review, (2023), 33, 1, (192-220), 10.1007/s11065-021-09533-0)
AU - Karantonis, James A.
AU - Carruthers, Sean P.
AU - Burdick, Katherine E.
AU - Pantelis, Christos
AU - Green, Melissa
AU - Rossell, Susan L.
AU - Hughes, Matthew E.
AU - Cropley, Vanessa
AU - Van Rheenen, Tamsyn E.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2023/3
Y1 - 2023/3
N2 - The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake in Fig. 1 caption. Below is the complete caption. Fig. 1 Three models to aid with data interpretation. Visual models of patterns of findings, a) findings likely to indicate brain morphological abnormalities more strongly associated with cognitive impairment, independent of SSD and/or BD disease presence; b) findings likely to indicate brain morphological abnormalities associated with SSD and/or BD disease presence, independent of cognitive impairment; c) findings likely to indicate brain morphological abnormalities reflecting the interaction of SSD and/or BD disease presence and cognitive impairment. Note ‘ ≠ ’ is indicative that there is a significant difference in brain morphology between(sub)groups; ‘ = ’ is indicative that there is no significant difference in brain morphology between (sub)groups. For brevity, the term ‘intact’ is used synonymously with ‘relatively intact’ The original article has been corrected.
AB - The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake in Fig. 1 caption. Below is the complete caption. Fig. 1 Three models to aid with data interpretation. Visual models of patterns of findings, a) findings likely to indicate brain morphological abnormalities more strongly associated with cognitive impairment, independent of SSD and/or BD disease presence; b) findings likely to indicate brain morphological abnormalities associated with SSD and/or BD disease presence, independent of cognitive impairment; c) findings likely to indicate brain morphological abnormalities reflecting the interaction of SSD and/or BD disease presence and cognitive impairment. Note ‘ ≠ ’ is indicative that there is a significant difference in brain morphology between(sub)groups; ‘ = ’ is indicative that there is no significant difference in brain morphology between (sub)groups. For brevity, the term ‘intact’ is used synonymously with ‘relatively intact’ The original article has been corrected.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85127241904
U2 - 10.1007/s11065-022-09541-8
DO - 10.1007/s11065-022-09541-8
M3 - Comment/debate
AN - SCOPUS:85127241904
SN - 1040-7308
VL - 33
SP - 221
JO - Neuropsychology Review
JF - Neuropsychology Review
IS - 1
ER -