Abstract
The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake in Fig. 1 caption. Below is the complete caption. Fig. 1 Three models to aid with data interpretation. Visual models of patterns of findings, a) findings likely to indicate brain morphological abnormalities more strongly associated with cognitive impairment, independent of SSD and/or BD disease presence; b) findings likely to indicate brain morphological abnormalities associated with SSD and/or BD disease presence, independent of cognitive impairment; c) findings likely to indicate brain morphological abnormalities reflecting the interaction of SSD and/or BD disease presence and cognitive impairment. Note ‘ ≠ ’ is indicative that there is a significant difference in brain morphology between(sub)groups; ‘ = ’ is indicative that there is no significant difference in brain morphology between (sub)groups. For brevity, the term ‘intact’ is used synonymously with ‘relatively intact’ The original article has been corrected.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 221 |
| Number of pages | 1 |
| Journal | Neuropsychology Review |
| Volume | 33 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs |
|
| State | Published - Mar 2023 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Correction to: Brain Morphological Characteristics of Cognitive Subgroups of Schizophrenia‑spectrum Disorders and Bipolar Disorder: a Systematic Review with Narrative Synthesis (Neuropsychology Review, (2023), 33, 1, (192-220), 10.1007/s11065-021-09533-0)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver