TY - JOUR
T1 - Correction
T2 - In vitro activity of imipenem-relebactam and ceftolozane-tazobactam against resistant gram-negative bacilli (Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (2018) 62:8 (e00533-18) DOI: 10.1128/AAC.02576-17)
AU - Schmidt-Malan, Suzannah M.
AU - Mishra, Avisya J.
AU - Mushtaq, Ammara
AU - Brinkman, Cassandra L.
AU - Patel, Robin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 American Society for Microbiology. 29 All January Rights 2019 Reserved.
PY - 2019/2
Y1 - 2019/2
N2 - Isolate IDRL-10579 in Supplemental Table S2 is Pseudomonas aeruginosa but was mistakenly reported as Klebsiella pneumoniae; the isolate should be listed in Table S2 under P. aeruginosa containing a KPC genetic resistance mechanism. Accordingly, in the 1st paragraph of Materials and Methods, of the 177 isolates which are carbapenemase positive, 118 (not 119) are K. pneumoniae and 5 (not 4) are P. aeruginosa. Also, in Supplemental Table S4, there are 85 (not 86) isolates which are K. pneumoniae complex and 2 (not 1) isolates which are P. aeruginosa. Revised versions of these two supplemental tables have been posted online. In addition, the KPC gene-positive section of Table 2 has been revised as shown below due to an error in the cumulative MIC results. Accordingly, in the Results section, in the 1st paragraph of “Carbapenemase gene-positive isolates,” 3% (not 5%) of the KPC-positive isolates were susceptible to imipenem, 2% (not 3%) were susceptible to cefepime, 1% (not 2%) were susceptible to ceftriaxone, and 3% (not 4%) were susceptible to ceftolozane-tazobactam. In the 3rd paragraph of the Discussion section, 95% (not 93%) of the KPC-positive isolates were resistant to imipenem alone.
AB - Isolate IDRL-10579 in Supplemental Table S2 is Pseudomonas aeruginosa but was mistakenly reported as Klebsiella pneumoniae; the isolate should be listed in Table S2 under P. aeruginosa containing a KPC genetic resistance mechanism. Accordingly, in the 1st paragraph of Materials and Methods, of the 177 isolates which are carbapenemase positive, 118 (not 119) are K. pneumoniae and 5 (not 4) are P. aeruginosa. Also, in Supplemental Table S4, there are 85 (not 86) isolates which are K. pneumoniae complex and 2 (not 1) isolates which are P. aeruginosa. Revised versions of these two supplemental tables have been posted online. In addition, the KPC gene-positive section of Table 2 has been revised as shown below due to an error in the cumulative MIC results. Accordingly, in the Results section, in the 1st paragraph of “Carbapenemase gene-positive isolates,” 3% (not 5%) of the KPC-positive isolates were susceptible to imipenem, 2% (not 3%) were susceptible to cefepime, 1% (not 2%) were susceptible to ceftriaxone, and 3% (not 4%) were susceptible to ceftolozane-tazobactam. In the 3rd paragraph of the Discussion section, 95% (not 93%) of the KPC-positive isolates were resistant to imipenem alone.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060829338&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1128/AAC.02563-18
DO - 10.1128/AAC.02563-18
M3 - Comment/debate
C2 - 30696694
AN - SCOPUS:85060829338
SN - 0066-4804
VL - 63
JO - Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
JF - Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
IS - 2
M1 - e02563-18
ER -