Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Coronary Intravascular Lithotripsy for Treatment of Severely Calcified Lesions: Long-Term Sex-Specific Outcomes

  • Jennifer Frampton
  • , Kathleen E. Kearney
  • , J. Dawn Abbott
  • , Dean J. Kereiakes
  • , Carlo Di Mario
  • , Shigeru Saito
  • , Ecaterina Cristea
  • , Robert F. Riley
  • , Jean Fajadet
  • , Richard A. Shlofmitz
  • , Ziad A. Ali
  • , Andrew J. Klein
  • , Matthew J. Price
  • , Jonathan M. Hill
  • , Gregg W. Stone
  • , Alexandra J. Lansky

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) for calcified lesion preparation prior to drug-eluting stent placement has high procedural success and safety, especially in women, whereas other atheroablative approaches are associated with increased procedural complications. We sought to investigate long-term sex-based outcomes of IVL-facilitated stenting. Methods: We performed a patient-level pooled analysis of the single-arm Disrupt CAD III and IV studies. Patient baseline, procedural characteristics, and outcomes were examined according to sex at 30 days and 1 year. The primary end point was major adverse cardiac events (a composite of cardiac death, all myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization). Target lesion failure was defined as cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization. Results: A total of 448 patients, 106 (24%) women, were included. Women were older and less likely to be smokers. Women had smaller reference vessel diameters (2.8 mm vs 3.1 mm), shorter lesion length (23.6 mm vs 27.1 mm), and shorter total calcified length (44.4 mm vs 49.3 mm) compared with men. Post-IVL angiographic outcomes and complications were similar between women and men. At 1 year, major adverse cardiac event rates (12.3% vs 13.2%, P = .52) were not different between women and men. There were no differences between women and men (10.4% vs 11.2%; P = .43) in target lesion failure at 1 year. Conclusions: Use of IVL in the treatment of severely calcified lesions is associated with low rates of adverse clinical events and with similar safety and effectiveness in women and men at 1 year.

Original languageEnglish
Article number101069
JournalJournal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions
Volume2
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Nov 2023

Keywords

  • calcification
  • coronary artery disease
  • drug-eluting stent
  • intravascular lithotripsy
  • sex

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Coronary Intravascular Lithotripsy for Treatment of Severely Calcified Lesions: Long-Term Sex-Specific Outcomes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this