TY - JOUR
T1 - Coronary Artery Calcium to Predict All-Cause Mortality in Elderly Men and Women
AU - Raggi, Paolo
AU - Gongora, Maria C.
AU - Gopal, Ambarish
AU - Callister, Tracy Q.
AU - Budoff, Matthew
AU - Shaw, Leslee J.
PY - 2008/7/1
Y1 - 2008/7/1
N2 - Objectives: We sought to study the prognostic utility of coronary artery calcium (CAC) in the elderly. Background: The prognostic significance of CAC in the elderly is not well known. Methods: All-cause mortality was assessed in 35,388 patients (3,570 were ≥70 years old at screening, and 50% were women) after a mean follow-up of 5.8 ± 3 years. Results: In older patients, risk factors and CAC were more prevalent. Overall survival was 97.9% at the end of follow-up. Mortality increased with each age decile with a relative hazard of 1.09 (95% confidence interval: 1.08 to 1.10, p < 0.0001), and rates were greater for men than women (hazard ratio: 1.53; 95% confidence interval: 1.32 to 1.77, p < 0.0001). Increasing CAC scores were associated with decreasing survival across all age deciles (p < 0.0001). Survival for a <40-year and ≥80-year-old man with a CAC score ≥400 was 88% and 19% (95% and 44% for a woman, p < 0.0001), respectively. Among the 20,562 patients with no CAC, annual mortality rates ranged from 0.3% to 2.2% for patients age 40 to 49 years or ≥70 years (p < 0.0001). The use of CAC allowed us to reclassify more than 40% of the patients ≥70 years old more often by excluding risk (i.e., CAC <400) in those with >3 risk factors. Conclusions: Despite their limited life expectancy, the use of CAC discriminates mortality risk in the elderly. Furthermore, the use of CAC allows physicians to reclassify risk in the elderly.
AB - Objectives: We sought to study the prognostic utility of coronary artery calcium (CAC) in the elderly. Background: The prognostic significance of CAC in the elderly is not well known. Methods: All-cause mortality was assessed in 35,388 patients (3,570 were ≥70 years old at screening, and 50% were women) after a mean follow-up of 5.8 ± 3 years. Results: In older patients, risk factors and CAC were more prevalent. Overall survival was 97.9% at the end of follow-up. Mortality increased with each age decile with a relative hazard of 1.09 (95% confidence interval: 1.08 to 1.10, p < 0.0001), and rates were greater for men than women (hazard ratio: 1.53; 95% confidence interval: 1.32 to 1.77, p < 0.0001). Increasing CAC scores were associated with decreasing survival across all age deciles (p < 0.0001). Survival for a <40-year and ≥80-year-old man with a CAC score ≥400 was 88% and 19% (95% and 44% for a woman, p < 0.0001), respectively. Among the 20,562 patients with no CAC, annual mortality rates ranged from 0.3% to 2.2% for patients age 40 to 49 years or ≥70 years (p < 0.0001). The use of CAC allowed us to reclassify more than 40% of the patients ≥70 years old more often by excluding risk (i.e., CAC <400) in those with >3 risk factors. Conclusions: Despite their limited life expectancy, the use of CAC discriminates mortality risk in the elderly. Furthermore, the use of CAC allows physicians to reclassify risk in the elderly.
KW - coronary calcium
KW - elderly
KW - gender
KW - mortality
KW - prognosis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=45549088331&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.04.004
DO - 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.04.004
M3 - Article
C2 - 18582630
AN - SCOPUS:45549088331
SN - 0735-1097
VL - 52
SP - 17
EP - 23
JO - Journal of the American College of Cardiology
JF - Journal of the American College of Cardiology
IS - 1
ER -