Abstract
The clinical and radiographic outcomes of 88 patients who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty with either conventional polyethylene or cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE) from the same manufacturer were compared. There were no significant differences between the 2 subpopulations regarding average age, gender, side affected, or prosthetic stem and cup size. The average follow-up was 104 months (range, 55 to 131 months). To the authors' knowledge, this is the longest follow-up for this particular insert. Clinical and radiographic evaluations were performed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months and then annually. Results showed that XLPE has a significantly greater wear reduction than that of standard polyethylene in primary total hip arthroplasty. At the longest available follow-up for these specific inserts, XLPE proved to be effective in reducing wear.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 556-561 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Orthopedics |
| Volume | 38 |
| Issue number | 9 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Sep 2015 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Conventional versus cross-linked polyethylene for total hip arthroplasty'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver