Controversies in the Assessment of Minimal Residual Disease in Multiple Myeloma: Clinical Significance of Minimal Residual Disease Negativity Using Highly Sensitive Techniques

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

20 Scopus citations

Abstract

Minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment has gained importance in the response evaluation of multiple myeloma. As discussed in part 1 of this two-part series, techniques such as multiparameter flow cytometry, polymerase chain reaction, and next-generation sequencing, of both bone marrow and peripheral blood, have the potential to achieve a high level of sensitivity, up to 1 in 10−6 cells, enabling analysis of genetically diverse subclones. Here, we review the clinical utility of MRD assessment using these techniques. Specifically, we review the association between MRD-negativity and progression-free or overall survival in various clinical settings (post-induction, post-auto or allo-stem cell transplant, transplant ineligible, maintenance, and relapsed/refractory). Currently, the goal of assessing MRD in multiple myeloma (MM) is to allow for a risk-stratified approach to therapy and for earlier identification of response to novel agents, particularly in the setting of clinical trials.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)368-378
Number of pages11
JournalCurrent Hematologic Malignancy Reports
Volume9
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2014

Keywords

  • Minimal residual disease
  • Multiparameter flow cytometry
  • Multiple myeloma
  • Next-generation sequencing
  • Polymerase chain reaction

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Controversies in the Assessment of Minimal Residual Disease in Multiple Myeloma: Clinical Significance of Minimal Residual Disease Negativity Using Highly Sensitive Techniques'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this