Continuous versus alternating combination chemotherapy for advanced small cell carcinoma of the lung

Kell Østerlind, Heine H. Hansen, Fred R. Hirsch, Mogens Hansen, Mikael Rørth, Sverre Sörenson, Per Dombernowsky

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

51 Scopus citations

Abstract

In a 2-year period, 146 patients with small cell carcinoma of the lung, staged as having extensive disease, were randomized to receive either continuous chemotherapy consisting of (a) 1-(2-chkxoethyl-3-cyck)hexyl-1-nitrosourea, cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and vincristine followed by (b) 4’-demethylepipodophyllotoxin 9-[4,6-0-(R) ethylidene-ß-D-glucopyranoside] and doxorubicin at progression of disease or a regimen of (a) alternating with (b). Seventy-six patients received the continuous regimen; 70 patients received alternating treatment. Response rates were 68 and 72%, respectively. The median duration of response was 16 weeks in patients receiving continuous treatment compared to 28 weeks in patients receiving alternating treatment (p < 0.05). No survival time difference was observed between the groups, median survival being 36 and 38 weeks, respectively. Four patients became long-term survivors (5.6+, 5.5+, 5.1, and 4.7+ years). All received alternating therapy. Six toxic deaths were observed among patients receiving continuous therapy compared to only one death among those in the alternating regimen. In conclusion, alternating combination chemotherapy leads to prolonged duration of remission. Duration of survival is not prolonged in uncured patients, but an increased possibility of long-term disease-free survival cannot be precluded.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)6085-6089
Number of pages5
JournalCancer Research
Volume43
StatePublished - 1 Dec 1983
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Continuous versus alternating combination chemotherapy for advanced small cell carcinoma of the lung'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this