Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Contemporary attitudes and beliefs on coronary artery calcium from social media using artificial intelligence

  • Sulaiman Somani
  • , Sujana Balla
  • , Allison W. Peng
  • , Ramzi Dudum
  • , Sneha Jain
  • , Khurram Nasir
  • , David J. Maron
  • , Tina Hernandez-Boussard
  • , Fatima Rodriguez

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Coronary artery calcium (CAC) is a powerful tool to refine atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk assessment. Despite its growing interest, contemporary public attitudes around CAC are not well-described in literature and have important implications for shared decision-making around cardiovascular prevention. We used an artificial intelligence (AI) pipeline consisting of a semi-supervised natural language processing model and unsupervised machine learning techniques to analyze 5,606 CAC-related discussions on Reddit. A total of 91 discussion topics were identified and were classified into 14 overarching thematic groups. These included the strong impact of CAC on therapeutic decision-making, ongoing non-evidence-based use of CAC testing, and the patient perceived downsides of CAC testing (e.g., radiation risk). Sentiment analysis also revealed that most discussions had a neutral (49.5%) or negative (48.4%) sentiment. The results of this study demonstrate the potential of an AI-based approach to analyze large, publicly available social media data to generate insights into public perceptions about CAC, which may help guide strategies to improve shared decision-making around ASCVD management and public health interventions.

Original languageEnglish
Article number83
Journalnpj Digital Medicine
Volume7
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2024
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Contemporary attitudes and beliefs on coronary artery calcium from social media using artificial intelligence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this