Consensus report: Definition and interpretation of remission in type 2 diabetes

Matthew C. Riddle, William T. Cefalu, Philip H. Evans, Hertzel C. Gerstein, Michael A. Nauck, William K. Oh, Amy E. Rothberg, Carel W. Le Roux, Francesco Rubino, Philip Schauer, Roy Taylor, Douglas Twenefour

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

133 Scopus citations

Abstract

Improvement of glucose levels into the normal range can occur in some people living with diabetes, either spontaneously or after medical interventions, and in some cases can persist after withdrawal of glucose-lowering pharmacotherapy. Such sustained improvement may now be occurring more often due to newer forms of treatment. However, terminology for describing this process and objective measures for defining it are not well established, and the long-term risks versus benefits of its attainment are not well understood. To update prior discussions of this issue, an international expert group was convened by the American Diabetes Association to propose nomenclature and principles for data collection and analysis, with the goal of establishing a base of information to support future clinical guidance. This group proposed “remission” as the most appropriate descriptive term, and HbA1c <6.5% (48 mmol/mol) measured at least 3 months after cessation of glucose-lowering pharmacotherapy as the usual diagnostic criterion. The group also made suggestions for active observation of individuals experiencing a remission and discussed further questions and unmet needs regarding predictors and outcomes of remission.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2438-2444
Number of pages7
JournalDiabetes Care
Volume44
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Oct 2021

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Consensus report: Definition and interpretation of remission in type 2 diabetes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this