Consensus guidelines for digital scholarship in academic promotion

Abbas Husain, Zachary Repanshek, Manpreet Singh, Felix Ankel, Jennifer Beck-Esmay, Daniel Cabrera, Teresa M. Chan, Robert Cooney, Michael Gisondi, Michael Gottlieb, Jay Khadpe, Jennifer Repanshek, Jessica Mason, Dimitrios Papanagnou, Jeff Riddell, N. Seth Trueger, Fareen Zaver, Emily Brumfield

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

25 Scopus citations


Introduction: As scholarship moves into the digital sphere, applicant and promotion and tenure (P&T) committee members lack formal guidance on evaluating the impact of digital scholarly work. The P&T process requires the appraisal of individual scholarly impact in comparison to scholars across institutions and disciplines. As dissemination methods evolve in the digital era, we must adapt traditional P&T processes to include emerging forms of digital scholarship. Methods: We conducted a blended, expert consensus procedure using a nominal group process to create a consensus document at the Council of Emergency Medicine Residency Directors Academic Assembly on April 1, 2019. Results: We discussed consensus guidelines for evaluation and promotion of digital scholarship with the intent to develop specific, evidence-supported recommendations to P&T committees and applicants. These recommendations included the following: demonstrate scholarship criteria; provide external evidence of impact; and include digital peer-review roles. As traditional scholarship continues to evolve within the digital realm, academic medicine should adapt how that scholarship is evaluated. P&T committees in academic medicine are at the epicenter for supporting this changing paradigm in scholarship. Conclusion: P&T committees can critically appraise the quality and impact of digital scholarship using specific, validated tools. Applicants for appointment and promotion should highlight and prepare their digital scholarship to specifically address quality, impact, breadth, and relevance. It is our goal to provide specific, timely guidance for both stakeholders to recognize the value of digital scholarship in advancing our field. [West J Emerg Med. 2020;21(4)882-890.].

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)882-890
Number of pages9
JournalWestern Journal of Emergency Medicine
Issue number4
StatePublished - 2020
Externally publishedYes


Dive into the research topics of 'Consensus guidelines for digital scholarship in academic promotion'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this