TY - JOUR
T1 - Consensus Guideline for the Management of Patients with Appendiceal Tumors, Part 1
T2 - Appendiceal Tumors Without Peritoneal Involvement
AU - Peritoneal Surface Malignancies (PSM) Consortium Group
AU - Godfrey, Elizabeth L.
AU - Mahoney, Forest
AU - Bansal, Varun V.
AU - Su, David G.
AU - Hanna, David N.
AU - Lopez-Ramirez, Felipe
AU - Baron, Ekaterina
AU - Turaga, Kiran K.
AU - Benson, Al B.
AU - Cusack, James
AU - Winer, Joshua H.
AU - Gunderson, Craig G.
AU - Misdraji, Joseph
AU - Shah, Rupen
AU - Magge, Deepa R.
AU - Solsky, Ian
AU - Eng, Cathy
AU - Eng, Oliver S.
AU - Shergill, Ardaman
AU - Shen, John Paul
AU - Foote, Michael B.
AU - Li, Yan
AU - Gao, Xiang
AU - Keutgen, Xavier
AU - Morano, William
AU - Bowne, Wilbur B.
AU - Luo, Wenyi
AU - Vudatha, Vignesh
AU - Morris, Van
AU - Gushchin, Vadim
AU - Khan, Uqba
AU - Sarpel, Umut
AU - Maduekwe, Ugwuji
AU - Grotz, Travis
AU - Nguyen, Trang
AU - Halfdanarson, Thorvardur
AU - Lwin, Thinzar
AU - Jaraczewski, Taylor
AU - Clark Gamblin, T.
AU - Campbell, Susan
AU - Libutti, Steven
AU - Ahrendt, Steven
AU - Greco, Stephanie
AU - Stein, Stacey
AU - Cohen, Stacey
AU - Misih, Sherif Abdel
AU - Radomski, Shannon
AU - Altpeter, Shannon
AU - Tuvin, Daniel
AU - Labow, Daniel
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© American Cancer Society 2025.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Background: Appendiceal tumors comprise a heterogeneous group of tumors that may be localized or disseminate throughout the peritoneum. Limited high quality clinical data exist and many practices have been extrapolated from colorectal cancer without validation in appendiceal cohorts. There are many controversies regarding the treatment of appendiceal tumors, and practices vary widely between centers and care settings. A national consensus update of best management practices for appendiceal malignancies was performed to better standardize care. Methods: The 2018 Chicago Consensus guideline was updated through a modified Delphi consensus, performed over two rounds using nationally circulated surveys. Supporting evidence was evaluated using rapid systematic reviews. Key systemic therapy concepts were summarized by content experts. Results: Most supporting literature consists of observational studies, but high-quality studies increasingly are becoming available to drive management. Two consensus-based pathways were generated for localized appendiceal tumors, one for epithelial mucinous neoplasms and another for appendiceal adenocarcinoma. Of 138 participants responding in the first round, 133 (96%) engaged in the second round. Greater than 90% consensus was achieved for all pathway blocks. Key points include minimizing intervention invasiveness where permitted by pathologic classification and margin status, and determining which margin and pathologic findings are indications for consideration of cytoreduction with or without intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Surveillance and systemic therapy recommendations are also presented. Conclusion: With growing but still primarily observational evidence currently dictating care, these consensus recommendations provide expert guidance in the treatment of appendiceal tumors without peritoneal involvement.
AB - Background: Appendiceal tumors comprise a heterogeneous group of tumors that may be localized or disseminate throughout the peritoneum. Limited high quality clinical data exist and many practices have been extrapolated from colorectal cancer without validation in appendiceal cohorts. There are many controversies regarding the treatment of appendiceal tumors, and practices vary widely between centers and care settings. A national consensus update of best management practices for appendiceal malignancies was performed to better standardize care. Methods: The 2018 Chicago Consensus guideline was updated through a modified Delphi consensus, performed over two rounds using nationally circulated surveys. Supporting evidence was evaluated using rapid systematic reviews. Key systemic therapy concepts were summarized by content experts. Results: Most supporting literature consists of observational studies, but high-quality studies increasingly are becoming available to drive management. Two consensus-based pathways were generated for localized appendiceal tumors, one for epithelial mucinous neoplasms and another for appendiceal adenocarcinoma. Of 138 participants responding in the first round, 133 (96%) engaged in the second round. Greater than 90% consensus was achieved for all pathway blocks. Key points include minimizing intervention invasiveness where permitted by pathologic classification and margin status, and determining which margin and pathologic findings are indications for consideration of cytoreduction with or without intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Surveillance and systemic therapy recommendations are also presented. Conclusion: With growing but still primarily observational evidence currently dictating care, these consensus recommendations provide expert guidance in the treatment of appendiceal tumors without peritoneal involvement.
KW - Appendiceal malignancies
KW - Cytoreductive surgical procedures
KW - Guidelines
KW - Peritoneal neoplasms
KW - Peritoneal surface malignancies
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105013809213
U2 - 10.1245/s10434-025-17359-w
DO - 10.1245/s10434-025-17359-w
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105013809213
SN - 1068-9265
JO - Annals of Surgical Oncology
JF - Annals of Surgical Oncology
ER -