Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Conformational analysis of the highly potent bradykinin antagonist hoe-140 by means of two different computational methods

  • Marta Filizola
  • , Nuria B. Centeno
  • , Maria Cartení-Farina
  • , Juan J. Perez

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Scopus citations

Abstract

The AMBER 4.0 force field was used to perform the characterization of the conformational profile of the highly potent bradykinin antagonist Hoe-140 (D-Arg0-Arg1-Pro2-Hyp3-Gly4- Thi5-Ser6-D-Tic7-Oic8-Arg9). The structural features of the peptide were assessed using two different computational methods, both capable to provide a good sampling of the low-energy conformations of the molecule. Specifically, the conformational space of the peptide was explored: i) computing molecular dynamics trajectories in cycles of high (900 K) and low (300 K) temperature and ii) using simulated annealing (SA) in an iterative fashion. Analysis of the structures characterized indicates that most of the low-energy conformations of the peptide exhibit a βII′-turn motif at its C-terminus, in agreement with previous experimental and theoretical studies. On the other hand, about a 50% of the low-energy conformations characterized also exhibit different β-turn type motifs at the N-terminus, whereas the rest of the conformations can be described as bends. Finally, in order to get new insights into the structural requirements necessary to design more potent and selective antagonists of bradykinin, present results were compared with those previously reported by this laboratory on the conformational preferences of the native nonapeptide and its DPhe7 analog.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)639-652
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics
Volume15
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Conformational analysis of the highly potent bradykinin antagonist hoe-140 by means of two different computational methods'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this