TY - JOUR
T1 - Conditioning Intensity for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients with Poor-Prognosis Cytogenetics in First Complete Remission
AU - Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia Working Group of the Japan Society for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation
AU - Konuma, Takaaki
AU - Kondo, Tadakazu
AU - Mizuno, Shohei
AU - Doki, Noriko
AU - Aoki, Jun
AU - Fukuda, Takahiro
AU - Tanaka, Masatsugu
AU - Sawa, Masashi
AU - Katayama, Yuta
AU - Uchida, Naoyuki
AU - Ozawa, Yukiyasu
AU - Morishige, Satoshi
AU - Matsuoka, Ken ichi
AU - Ichinohe, Tatsuo
AU - Onizuka, Makoto
AU - Kanda, Junya
AU - Atsuta, Yoshiko
AU - Yanada, Masamitsu
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy
PY - 2020/3
Y1 - 2020/3
N2 - The optimal intensity of conditioning regimen may be dependent on not only age and comorbidities but also disease characteristics and risk of relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). We, therefore, analyzed the transplant outcomes of 840 adult patients with cytogenetically poor-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR1) who received first allogeneic HCT with either myeloablative conditioning (MAC; n = 652) or reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC; n = 188) between 2006 and 2017. The median age at HCT was 50.5 years (range: 16 to 77 years). The multivariate analysis showed that patients receiving MAC had a significantly higher overall survival and lower leukemia-related mortality than those receiving RIC (P = .011 and P = .025, respectively). In the subgroup analysis, these results applied to patients aged 16 to 59 years, with HCT-comorbidity index scores ≥3, and with cytogenetic remission. Among MAC regimens, there was a trend for worse survival and nonrelapse mortality with the busulfan/fludarabine-based regimen compared with the total body irradiation (TBI) ≥8 Gy-based regimen (P = .082 and P = .062, respectively), whereas the busulfan/cyclophosphamide-based regimen and the fludarabine/melphalan-based regimen had similar outcomes with the TBI-based regimen. These data suggest that MAC is preferable to RIC for patients with cytogenetically poor-risk AML undergoing allogeneic HCT in CR1.
AB - The optimal intensity of conditioning regimen may be dependent on not only age and comorbidities but also disease characteristics and risk of relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). We, therefore, analyzed the transplant outcomes of 840 adult patients with cytogenetically poor-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR1) who received first allogeneic HCT with either myeloablative conditioning (MAC; n = 652) or reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC; n = 188) between 2006 and 2017. The median age at HCT was 50.5 years (range: 16 to 77 years). The multivariate analysis showed that patients receiving MAC had a significantly higher overall survival and lower leukemia-related mortality than those receiving RIC (P = .011 and P = .025, respectively). In the subgroup analysis, these results applied to patients aged 16 to 59 years, with HCT-comorbidity index scores ≥3, and with cytogenetic remission. Among MAC regimens, there was a trend for worse survival and nonrelapse mortality with the busulfan/fludarabine-based regimen compared with the total body irradiation (TBI) ≥8 Gy-based regimen (P = .082 and P = .062, respectively), whereas the busulfan/cyclophosphamide-based regimen and the fludarabine/melphalan-based regimen had similar outcomes with the TBI-based regimen. These data suggest that MAC is preferable to RIC for patients with cytogenetically poor-risk AML undergoing allogeneic HCT in CR1.
KW - Acute myeloid leukemia
KW - Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation
KW - First complete remission
KW - Myeloablative conditioning
KW - Poor-risk cytogenetics
KW - Reduced-intensity conditioning
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074530022&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.bbmt.2019.09.025
DO - 10.1016/j.bbmt.2019.09.025
M3 - Article
C2 - 31562960
AN - SCOPUS:85074530022
SN - 1083-8791
VL - 26
SP - 463
EP - 471
JO - Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation
JF - Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation
IS - 3
ER -