TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of selective left ventriculograms with levophase ("forward") ventriculograms in patients with coronary artery disease
AU - Ferlinz, Jack
AU - Herman, Michael V.
AU - Cohn, Peter F.
AU - Gorlin, Richard
PY - 1976/6
Y1 - 1976/6
N2 - In order to compare levophase ("forward") ventriculograms to standard (selective) LV cineangiography, 10 patients with coronary artery disease were studied by (1) selective injection of contrast medium into the LV cavity followed by (2) injection into the right ventricle and filming the levophase. Biplane cineangiograms were used to calculate the end-diastolic volume index (EDVI), end-systolic volume index (ESVI), stroke volume index (SVI), and ejection fraction (EF). Values for the two respective techniques were then compared. Not only were correlation coefficients for the two methods low, but there was also a statistically significant difference between the two SVI (66±26 ml. for selective and 53±25 ml. for levophase injection; p<0.02) and the two EF (67 ±7 per cent for selective and 52±12 per cent for levophase injection; p<0.01). Levophase cineangiograms therefore significantly underestimate the LV ejection fraction when compared to standard (selective) LV cineangiography. These differences must be considered when evaluating greatly divergent interinstitutional survival rates for patients with low EF who undergo coronary artery bypass surgery, and when selecting candidates for bypass surgery on the basis of the angiographic data.
AB - In order to compare levophase ("forward") ventriculograms to standard (selective) LV cineangiography, 10 patients with coronary artery disease were studied by (1) selective injection of contrast medium into the LV cavity followed by (2) injection into the right ventricle and filming the levophase. Biplane cineangiograms were used to calculate the end-diastolic volume index (EDVI), end-systolic volume index (ESVI), stroke volume index (SVI), and ejection fraction (EF). Values for the two respective techniques were then compared. Not only were correlation coefficients for the two methods low, but there was also a statistically significant difference between the two SVI (66±26 ml. for selective and 53±25 ml. for levophase injection; p<0.02) and the two EF (67 ±7 per cent for selective and 52±12 per cent for levophase injection; p<0.01). Levophase cineangiograms therefore significantly underestimate the LV ejection fraction when compared to standard (selective) LV cineangiography. These differences must be considered when evaluating greatly divergent interinstitutional survival rates for patients with low EF who undergo coronary artery bypass surgery, and when selecting candidates for bypass surgery on the basis of the angiographic data.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0017118216
U2 - 10.1016/S0002-8703(76)80537-6
DO - 10.1016/S0002-8703(76)80537-6
M3 - Article
C2 - 1274822
AN - SCOPUS:0017118216
SN - 0002-8703
VL - 91
SP - 721
EP - 725
JO - American Heart Journal
JF - American Heart Journal
IS - 6
ER -