Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Comparison of outcomes after 8 vs. 9.5 French size intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation catheters based on 9,332 patients in the prospective Benchmark® registry

  • Marc Cohen
  • , James J. Ferguson
  • , Robert J. Freedman
  • , Michael F. Miller
  • , Ramachandra C. Reddy
  • , E. Magnus Ohman
  • , Gregg W. Stone
  • , Jan Christenson
  • , Debra L. Joseph

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

40 Scopus citations

Abstract

The Benchmark intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation (IABC) registry maintains prospectively gathered clinical information on a large cohort of IABC patients. The purpose of the present report is to compare in-hospital outcomes and complications in patients treated with the newer 8 vs. 9.5 Fr size catheters. Between January 1997 and August 2000, data on 7,078 9.5 Fr and 2,254 8 Fr IABC insertions were submitted to Benchmark. This was not a randomized comparison but rather a posthoc analysis of prospectively gathered data. There was less limb ischemia with the 8 Fr IABC size catheter. There were no significant differences in bleeding or mortality between the two groups. Smaller IABC catheter size is associated with significantly less limb ischemia, especially in higher-risk patients. The large, population-based, ongoing Benchmark registry provides a useful vehicle for outcomes research concerning the evolving practice of IABC.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)200-206
Number of pages7
JournalCatheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Volume56
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2002
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Balloon
  • Heart assist device
  • Peripheral vascular disease
  • Population

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of outcomes after 8 vs. 9.5 French size intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation catheters based on 9,332 patients in the prospective Benchmark® registry'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this