Abstract
The Benchmark intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation (IABC) registry maintains prospectively gathered clinical information on a large cohort of IABC patients. The purpose of the present report is to compare in-hospital outcomes and complications in patients treated with the newer 8 vs. 9.5 Fr size catheters. Between January 1997 and August 2000, data on 7,078 9.5 Fr and 2,254 8 Fr IABC insertions were submitted to Benchmark. This was not a randomized comparison but rather a posthoc analysis of prospectively gathered data. There was less limb ischemia with the 8 Fr IABC size catheter. There were no significant differences in bleeding or mortality between the two groups. Smaller IABC catheter size is associated with significantly less limb ischemia, especially in higher-risk patients. The large, population-based, ongoing Benchmark registry provides a useful vehicle for outcomes research concerning the evolving practice of IABC.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 200-206 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions |
| Volume | 56 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2002 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Balloon
- Heart assist device
- Peripheral vascular disease
- Population
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of outcomes after 8 vs. 9.5 French size intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation catheters based on 9,332 patients in the prospective Benchmark® registry'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver