Comparison of Mammography AI Algorithms with a Clinical Risk Model for 5-year Breast Cancer Risk Prediction: An Observational Study

Vignesh A. Arasu, Laurel A. Habel, Ninah S. Achacoso, Diana S.M. Buist, Jason B. Cord, Laura J. Esserman, Nola M. Hylton, M. Maria Glymour, John Kornak, Lawrence H. Kushi, Donald A. Lewis, Vincent X. Liu, Caitlin M. Lydon, Diana L. Miglioretti, Daniel A. Navarro, Albert Pu, Li Shen, Weiva Sieh, Hyo Chun Yoon, Catherine Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Although several clinical breast cancer risk models are used to guide screening and prevention, they have only moderate discrimination. Purpose: To compare selected existing mammography artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms and the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (BCSC) risk model for prediction of 5-year risk. Materials and Methods: This retrospective case-cohort study included data in women with a negative screening mammographic examination (no visible evidence of cancer) in 2016, who were followed until 2021 at Kaiser Permanente Northern California. Women with prior breast cancer or a highly penetrant gene mutation were excluded. Of the 324 009 eligible women, a random subcohort was selected, regardless of cancer status, to which all additional patients with breast cancer were added. The index screening mammographic examination was used as input for five AI algorithms to generate continuous scores that were compared with the BCSC clinical risk score. Risk estimates for incident breast cancer 0 to 5 years after the initial mammographic examination were calculated using a time-dependent area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results: The subcohort included 13 628 patients, of whom 193 had incident cancer. Incident cancers in eligible patients (additional 4391 of 324 009) were also included. For incident cancers at 0 to 5 years, the time-dependent AUC for BCSC was 0.61 (95% CI: 0.60, 0.62). AI algorithms had higher time-dependent AUCs than did BCSC, ranging from 0.63 to 0.67 (Bonferroni-adjusted P < .0016). Time-dependent AUCs for combined BCSC and AI models were slightly higher than AI alone (AI with BCSC time-dependent AUC range, 0.66-0.68; Bonferroni-adjusted P < .0016). Conclusion: When using a negative screening examination, AI algorithms performed better than the BCSC risk model for predicting breast cancer risk at 0 to 5 years. Combined AI and BCSC models further improved prediction.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere222733
JournalRadiology
Volume307
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2023

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of Mammography AI Algorithms with a Clinical Risk Model for 5-year Breast Cancer Risk Prediction: An Observational Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this