Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Comparison of in-person versus tele-ultrasound point-of-care ultrasound training during the COVID-19 pandemic

  • Nilam J. Soni
  • , Jeremy S. Boyd
  • , Gregory Mints
  • , Kevin C. Proud
  • , Trevor P. Jensen
  • , Gigi Liu
  • , Benji K. Mathews
  • , Christopher K. Schott
  • , Linda Kurian
  • , Charles M. LoPresti
  • , Phil Andrus
  • , Robert Nathanson
  • , Natalie Smith
  • , Elizabeth K. Haro
  • , Michael J. Mader
  • , Jacqueline Pugh
  • , Marcos I. Restrepo
  • , Brian P. Lucas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

47 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Lack of training is currently the most common barrier to implementation of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) use in clinical practice, and in-person POCUS continuing medical education (CME) courses have been paramount in improving this training gap. Due to travel restrictions and physical distancing requirements during the COVID-19 pandemic, most in-person POCUS training courses were cancelled. Though tele-ultrasound technology has existed for several years, use of tele-ultrasound technology to deliver hands-on training during a POCUS CME course has not been previously described. Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational study comparing educational outcomes, course evaluations, and learner and faculty feedback from in-person versus tele-ultrasound POCUS courses. The same POCUS educational curriculum was delivered to learners by the two course formats. Data from the most recent pre-pandemic in-person course were compared to tele-ultrasound courses during the COVID-19 pandemic. Results: Pre- and post-course knowledge test scores of learners from the in-person (n = 88) and tele-ultrasound course (n = 52) were compared. Though mean pre-course knowledge test scores were higher among learners of the tele-ultrasound versus in-person course (78% vs. 71%; p = 0.001), there was no significant difference in the post-course test scores between learners of the two course formats (89% vs. 87%; p = 0.069). Both learners and faculty rated the tele-ultrasound course highly (4.6–5.0 on a 5-point scale) for effectiveness of virtual lectures, tele-ultrasound hands-on scanning sessions, and course administration. Faculty generally expressed less satisfaction with their ability to engage with learners, troubleshoot image acquisition, and provide feedback during the tele-ultrasound course but felt learners completed the tele-ultrasound course with a better basic POCUS skillset. Conclusions: Compared to a traditional in-person course, tele-ultrasound POCUS CME courses appeared to be as effective for improving POCUS knowledge post-course and fulfilling learning objectives. Our findings can serve as a roadmap for educators seeking guidance on development of a tele-ultrasound POCUS training course whose demand will likely persist beyond the COVID-19 pandemic.

Original languageEnglish
Article number39
JournalUltrasound Journal
Volume13
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2021
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of in-person versus tele-ultrasound point-of-care ultrasound training during the COVID-19 pandemic'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this