Comparison of iatrogenic splenectomy during open and laparoscopic colon resection

Marcus M. Malek, Alexander J. Greenstein, Edward H. Chin, Scott Q. Nguyen, Adam L. Sandler, Ray K. Wong, John C. Byrn, Lester B. Katz, Celia M. Divino

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

32 Scopus citations

Abstract

Iatrogenic splenic injury requiring splenectomy is a well-recognized and potentially serious complication of colon resection. Iatrogenic splenectomy is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, including bleeding and the postsplenectomy sepsis syndrome. Our study aims to compare the incidence of iatrogenic splenectomy in laparoscopic colon resection with that of open colon resection over an 11-year-period at Mount Sinai. A retrospective chart review of all patients undergoing colon resection at Mount Sinai Medical Center during the last 11 years was performed to identify patient demographics, procedure, indication, and outcome. There was a significant difference (P=0.03) in the incidence of iatrogenic splenectomy during open colectomy (13/5477, 0.24%) versus laparoscopic colectomy (0/1911, 0%). All cases complicated by iatrogenic splenectomy involved splenic flexure mobilization. Laparoscopy has many recognized advantages over open procedures, including shorter recovery and length of stay. This retrospective review of our experience at Mount Sinai presents another potential benefit of the laparoscopic approach to colon resection.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)385-387
Number of pages3
JournalSurgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques
Volume17
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2007

Keywords

  • Colon resection
  • Iatrogenic
  • Laparoscopy
  • Splenectomy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of iatrogenic splenectomy during open and laparoscopic colon resection'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this