TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of four echocardiographic techniques for measuring left ventricular ejection fraction
AU - Nahar, Tamanna
AU - Croft, Lori
AU - Shapiro, Robert
AU - Fruchtman, Steven
AU - Diamond, Joseph
AU - Henzlova, Milena
AU - Machac, Joseph
AU - Buckley, Samantha
AU - Goldman, Martin E.
PY - 2000/12/15
Y1 - 2000/12/15
N2 - Accurate quantitative measurement of left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) by 2-dimensional echocardiography is limited by subjective visual endocardial border detection. Both harmonic and precision contrast microbubbles provide better delineation of endocardial borders than fundamental imaging. The aim of this study was to correlate 2-dimensional echocardiographic quantification of LVEF measured by 4 currently available techniques with radionuclide angiography. A total of 50 patients who underwent radionuclide (EF) measurement (47 of 50 had technically difficult echocardiograms by fundamental imaging) underwent echocardiography by 4 methods: fundamental alone, fundamental with contrast, harmonic alone, and harmonic with contrast. Three echocardiologists measured the biplane 2-dimensional echocardiographic LVEF independently and were blinded to radionuclide angiography. The correlation of echocardiographic EF with radionuclide EF improved incrementally with each method. However, contrast with harmonic imaging provided the closest correlation (r = 0.95, 0.96, and 0.95 as assessed by the 3 independent analysts. (C) 2000 by Excerpta Medica, Inc.
AB - Accurate quantitative measurement of left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) by 2-dimensional echocardiography is limited by subjective visual endocardial border detection. Both harmonic and precision contrast microbubbles provide better delineation of endocardial borders than fundamental imaging. The aim of this study was to correlate 2-dimensional echocardiographic quantification of LVEF measured by 4 currently available techniques with radionuclide angiography. A total of 50 patients who underwent radionuclide (EF) measurement (47 of 50 had technically difficult echocardiograms by fundamental imaging) underwent echocardiography by 4 methods: fundamental alone, fundamental with contrast, harmonic alone, and harmonic with contrast. Three echocardiologists measured the biplane 2-dimensional echocardiographic LVEF independently and were blinded to radionuclide angiography. The correlation of echocardiographic EF with radionuclide EF improved incrementally with each method. However, contrast with harmonic imaging provided the closest correlation (r = 0.95, 0.96, and 0.95 as assessed by the 3 independent analysts. (C) 2000 by Excerpta Medica, Inc.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034672482&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0002-9149(00)01243-1
DO - 10.1016/S0002-9149(00)01243-1
M3 - Article
C2 - 11113413
AN - SCOPUS:0034672482
SN - 0002-9149
VL - 86
SP - 1358
EP - 1362
JO - American Journal of Cardiology
JF - American Journal of Cardiology
IS - 12
ER -