Comparing university rankings

Isidro F. Aguillo, Judit Bar-Ilan, Mark Levene, José Luis Ortega

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperpeer-review

2 Scopus citations


Recently there is increasing interest in university rankings. Annual rankings of world universities are published by QS for the Times Higher Education Supplement, the Shanghai Jiao Tong University, the Higher Education and Accreditation Council of Taiwan and rankings based on Web visibility by the Cybermetrics Lab at CSIC. In this paper we compare the rankings using a set of similarity measures. For the rankings that are being published for a number of years we also examine longitudinal patterns. The rankings limited to European universities are compared to the ranking of the Centre for Science and Technology Studies at Leiden University. The findings show that there are reasonable similarities between the rankings, even though each applies a different methodology. The biggest differences are between the rankings provided by the QS-Times Higher Education Supplement and the Ranking Web of the CSIC Cybermetrics Lab. The highest similarities were observed between the Taiwanese and the Leiden rankings from European universities. Overall the similarities are increased when the comparison is limited to the European universities.

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages11
StatePublished - 2009
Externally publishedYes
Event12th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, ISSI 2009 - Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Duration: 14 Jul 200917 Jul 2009


Conference12th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, ISSI 2009
CityRio de Janeiro


Dive into the research topics of 'Comparing university rankings'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this