Comparative studies of epibatidine derivatives [18F]NFEP and [18F]n- methyl-NFEP: Kinetics, nicotine effect, and toxicity

Yu Shin Ding, Patricia E. Molina, Joanna S. Fowler, Jean Logan, Nora D. Volkow, Michael J. Kuhar, F. Ivy Carroll

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

56 Scopus citations

Abstract

We have previously shown that [18F]norchlorofluoroepibatidine ([18F]NFEP)would be an ideal radiotracer for positron emission tomography (PET) imaging of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChR); however, its high toxicity is a limiting factor for human studies. We, therefore, synthesized its N-methyl derivative ([18F]N-Me-NFEP) and carried out comparative studies. The distribution volumes for different brain regions were higher for [18F]N-Me-NFEP than those for [18F]NFEP (average: 52.5 ± 0.9 vs. 36.4 ± 0.7 for thalamus), though the distribution volume (DV) ratios were similar (3.93 ± 0.27 vs. 3.65 ± 0.19 for thalamus to cerebellum). Treatment with nicotine reduced the binding of both radiotracers. Toxicology studies in awake rats showed that N-methyl-NFEP has a lower mortality (0 vs. 30%) and smaller effect on plasma catecholamines than NFEP at a dose of 1.5 μg/kg. However, marked alterations in cardiorespiratory parameters were observed after injection of N-methyl-NFEP (0.5 μg/kg, IV) to an awake dog. Our results suggest that although the binding characteristics of [18 F]NFEP and [18 F]N-Me-NFEP appear to be ideally suited for PET imaging studies of the human brain, their relatively small safety margin will limit their use in humans.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)139-148
Number of pages10
JournalNuclear Medicine and Biology
Volume26
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1999
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Epibatidine
  • Fluorine- 18
  • Nicotine
  • Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors
  • PET
  • Toxicity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative studies of epibatidine derivatives [18F]NFEP and [18F]n- methyl-NFEP: Kinetics, nicotine effect, and toxicity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this