Comparative Effectiveness Trials of Imaging-Guided Strategies in Stable Ischemic Heart Disease

Leslee J. Shaw, Lawrence M. Phillips, Eike Nagel, David E. Newby, Jagat Narula, Pamela S. Douglas

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

23 Scopus citations


The evaluation of patients with suspected stable ischemic heart disease is among the most common diagnostic evaluations with nearly 20 million imaging and exercise stress tests performed annually in the United States. Over the past decade, there has been an evolution in imaging research with an ever-increasing focus on larger registries and randomized trials comparing the effectiveness of varying diagnostic algorithms. The current review highlights recent randomized trial evidence with a particular focus comparing the effectiveness of cardiac imaging procedures within the stable ischemic heart disease evaluation for coronary artery disease detection, angina, and other quality of life measures, and major clinical outcomes. Also highlighted are secondary analyses from these trials on the economic findings related to comparative cost differences across diagnostic testing strategies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)321-334
Number of pages14
JournalJACC: Cardiovascular Imaging
Issue number3
StatePublished - 1 Mar 2017


  • cardiac imaging
  • diagnostic testing
  • randomized trials
  • stable ischemic heart disease


Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative Effectiveness Trials of Imaging-Guided Strategies in Stable Ischemic Heart Disease'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this