Community Protection versus Individual Healing: Two Traditions in Community Mental Health

  • Philip T. Yanos
  • , Edward L. Knight
  • , Beth Vayshenker
  • , Lauren Gonzales
  • , Joseph S. DeLuca

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

This article identifies two major traditions that drive the mandate for a community mental health care system-community protection and individual healing. It discusses the historical antecedents of these two traditions and how these traditions relate to different visions of what the "common good" means. It then discusses how they both operate in the current US-based system, creating inherent conflicts and tensions, and gives specific examples from the personal and professional experiences of the authors. The article proposes ways to reduce the tension and discusses what sacrifices and compromises this resolution would entail for the US community mental health system.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)288-302
Number of pages15
JournalBehavioral Sciences and the Law
Volume35
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jul 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Community Protection versus Individual Healing: Two Traditions in Community Mental Health'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this