Abstract
This article identifies two major traditions that drive the mandate for a community mental health care system-community protection and individual healing. It discusses the historical antecedents of these two traditions and how these traditions relate to different visions of what the "common good" means. It then discusses how they both operate in the current US-based system, creating inherent conflicts and tensions, and gives specific examples from the personal and professional experiences of the authors. The article proposes ways to reduce the tension and discusses what sacrifices and compromises this resolution would entail for the US community mental health system.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 288-302 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Behavioral Sciences and the Law |
| Volume | 35 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Jul 2017 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Community Protection versus Individual Healing: Two Traditions in Community Mental Health'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver