TY - JOUR
T1 - Cognitive aging is not created equally
T2 - differentiating unique cognitive phenotypes in “normal” adults
AU - Casaletto, Kaitlin B.
AU - Elahi, Fanny M.
AU - Staffaroni, Adam M.
AU - Walters, Samantha
AU - Contreras, Wilfredo Rivera
AU - Wolf, Amy
AU - Dubal, Dena
AU - Miller, Bruce
AU - Yaffe, Kristine
AU - Kramer, Joel H.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2019/5
Y1 - 2019/5
N2 - Age-related cognitive decline is a public health problem but highly diverse and difficult to predict. We captured nonoverlapping cognitive phenotypes in high-functioning adults and identified baseline factors differentiating trajectories. Three hundred fourteen functionally normal adults (M = 69 y) completed 2+ visits. Participants with sample-based longitudinal slopes in memory or processing speed less than −1 SD were classified as “declining” on that measure; 29 and 50 individuals had slopes less than −1 SD on processing speed or memory, respectively; 2.5% met criteria for both, who were excluded. At baseline, speed decliners demonstrated greater age, inflammation, and cognitive complaints compared with speed-stable adults; memory decliners were more likely to be male and had lower depressive symptoms, gray matter volumes, and white matter hyperintensities compared with memory-stable adults. Baseline speed, TNFα and cognitive complaints accurately classified 96.3% of future speed decliners; baseline memory, sex, precuneal volume, and white matter hyperintensities accurately classified 88.5% of future memory decliners. There are discrete cognitive aging phenotypes reflecting nonoverlapping vulnerabilities in high-functioning adults. Early markers can predict cognition even within the “normal” spectrum and underscore therapeutic targets.
AB - Age-related cognitive decline is a public health problem but highly diverse and difficult to predict. We captured nonoverlapping cognitive phenotypes in high-functioning adults and identified baseline factors differentiating trajectories. Three hundred fourteen functionally normal adults (M = 69 y) completed 2+ visits. Participants with sample-based longitudinal slopes in memory or processing speed less than −1 SD were classified as “declining” on that measure; 29 and 50 individuals had slopes less than −1 SD on processing speed or memory, respectively; 2.5% met criteria for both, who were excluded. At baseline, speed decliners demonstrated greater age, inflammation, and cognitive complaints compared with speed-stable adults; memory decliners were more likely to be male and had lower depressive symptoms, gray matter volumes, and white matter hyperintensities compared with memory-stable adults. Baseline speed, TNFα and cognitive complaints accurately classified 96.3% of future speed decliners; baseline memory, sex, precuneal volume, and white matter hyperintensities accurately classified 88.5% of future memory decliners. There are discrete cognitive aging phenotypes reflecting nonoverlapping vulnerabilities in high-functioning adults. Early markers can predict cognition even within the “normal” spectrum and underscore therapeutic targets.
KW - Alzheimer's disease
KW - Cytokines
KW - Episodic memory
KW - Mood
KW - Neuroimaging
KW - Processing speed
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061441234&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2019.01.007
DO - 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2019.01.007
M3 - Article
C2 - 30772736
AN - SCOPUS:85061441234
SN - 0197-4580
VL - 77
SP - 13
EP - 19
JO - Neurobiology of Aging
JF - Neurobiology of Aging
ER -