TY - JOUR
T1 - Clinical trials in long-term antiplatelet therapies
T2 - focus on the role of aspirin
AU - Goel, Ridhima
AU - Baber, Usman
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2019 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved
PY - 2019/7/1
Y1 - 2019/7/1
N2 - Purpose of review The purpose of this review is to summarize the existing evidence for use of long-term antiplatelet therapies for primary and secondary prevention of adverse cardiovascular events. Recent findings In the setting of primary prevention, several contemporary trials have shown a lack of net clinical benefit with use of aspirin across different patient groups, including those with diabetes mellitus, older age or high estimated cardiac risk. For secondary prevention, the addition of either ticagrelor or low-dose rivaroxaban to aspirin monotherapy significantly lowered recurrent vascular events, albeit with excess bleeding. Aspirin withdrawal did not result in excess thrombotic risk or less bleeding among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) treated with ticagrelor. Summary In the contemporary era, routine use of aspirin is not beneficial in the majority of patients free of cardiac disease. In contrast, for secondary prevention, aspirin monotherapy is not sufficient to lower recurrent vascular risk. Antiplatelet monotherapy with ticagrelor may emerge as an alternative to lower bleeding whereas maintaining ischemic efficacy in selected patients undergoing PCI.
AB - Purpose of review The purpose of this review is to summarize the existing evidence for use of long-term antiplatelet therapies for primary and secondary prevention of adverse cardiovascular events. Recent findings In the setting of primary prevention, several contemporary trials have shown a lack of net clinical benefit with use of aspirin across different patient groups, including those with diabetes mellitus, older age or high estimated cardiac risk. For secondary prevention, the addition of either ticagrelor or low-dose rivaroxaban to aspirin monotherapy significantly lowered recurrent vascular events, albeit with excess bleeding. Aspirin withdrawal did not result in excess thrombotic risk or less bleeding among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) treated with ticagrelor. Summary In the contemporary era, routine use of aspirin is not beneficial in the majority of patients free of cardiac disease. In contrast, for secondary prevention, aspirin monotherapy is not sufficient to lower recurrent vascular risk. Antiplatelet monotherapy with ticagrelor may emerge as an alternative to lower bleeding whereas maintaining ischemic efficacy in selected patients undergoing PCI.
KW - antiplatelet therapy
KW - aspirin
KW - bleeding
KW - ticagrelor
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067375877&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/HCO.0000000000000640
DO - 10.1097/HCO.0000000000000640
M3 - Review article
C2 - 31082853
AN - SCOPUS:85067375877
SN - 0268-4705
VL - 34
SP - 315
EP - 322
JO - Current Opinion in Cardiology
JF - Current Opinion in Cardiology
IS - 4
ER -