Clinical significance of echogenic amniotic fluid

Boris Petrikovsky, Elizabeth P. Schneider, Beth Gross

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose. This study aimed to determine the clinical significance of echogenic amniotic fluid. Methods. We prospectively studied 19 twin pregnancies in which the amniotic fluid in 1 sac was anechoic and that in the other sac was echogenic. Morphologic characteristics of amniotic fluid were assessed from samples taken at amniocentesis or upon delivery within 48 hours after sonographic examination. Results. In twins with echogenic amniotic fluid, assessment revealed clear fluid in 6 cases (32%), vernix caseosa in 12 (63%), and meconium in 1 (5%). In cotwins with anechoic amniotic fluid, assessment revealed clear fluid in 9 cases (47%), vernix caseosa in 6 (32%), and meconium in 4 (21%). Conclusions. Echogenic amniotic fluid on prenatal sonography is not predictive of meconium.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)191-193
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Clinical Ultrasound
Volume26
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1998
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Amniotic fluid assessment
  • Prenatal ultrasonography
  • Twins

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Clinical significance of echogenic amniotic fluid'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this